Back to homeMathematics · 2nd Bach. Social Sciences · Change subject
Start for free
BAC2 ss · Mathematics
Chance and probability · Probability

"Interpretations of probability: classical, frequentist and subjective"

"What is the probability that it will rain tomorrow?" is not calculated in the same way as "what is the probability of rolling a 6 with a die?". In the second case you can count cases; in the first, there are no "equally likely cases" to count. There are three different ways of putting a number on uncertainty, and each one is used in a different type of situation.

Before you start, make sure you know: Definitions (1st Bachillerato CCSS)
Before you start, make sure you know: Relative frequency and experimental probability (2nd ESO)

Classical interpretation: Laplace's rule

Diagram of Laplace's rule with 2 favourable cases marked out of 6 possible outcomes of a die favourable = 2 (less than 3) possible = 6 (the faces of the die) P = 2/6 = 1/3
Practice★☆☆Not started
On a European roulette wheel ($37$ pockets: $18$ red, $18$ black and the green zero), $5.000$ spins have been recorded, and the ball landed on red $2.560$ times. a) What…

On a European roulette wheel ($37$ pockets: $18$ red, $18$ black and the green zero), $5.000$ spins have been recorded, and the ball landed on red $2.560$ times.

  • a) What probability of "red" does the classical interpretation (Laplace's rule) assign?

  • b) What probability does the relative frequency interpretation assign based on the data?

  • c) Comment on which of the two you would give more credibility to, and why.

Solve

Frequentist interpretation and the law of large numbers

What if you do not know in advance that the outcomes are equally likely, as with a die that might be loaded? Then you experiment many times and observe the relative frequency.

Animation of the graph of relative frequency against number of rolls: the curve is drawn from left to right with a point tracing it, with large oscillations at first that die down until they hug the dashed line of probability p, according to the law of large numbers. p fᵣ oscillates a lot at first and settles near p
Practice★☆☆Not started
A die has been rolled $200$ times and these results were obtained: | Face | $1$ | $2$ | $3$ | $4$ | $5$ | $6$ | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Frequency | $38$ | $33$ |…

A die has been rolled $200$ times and these results were obtained:

Face $1$ $2$ $3$ $4$ $5$ $6$
Frequency $38$ $33$ $30$ $35$ $34$ $30$
  • a) Calculate the relative frequency of each face.

  • b) Estimate the probability of rolling an even number with this die.

  • c) Do your estimates match the probabilities given by Laplace's rule? Comment on the difference.

Solve
Practice★★☆Not started
A board game die is suspected to be biased. It is rolled $1.000$ times and the following results are obtained: | Face | $1$ | $2$ | $3$ | $4$ | $5$ | $6$ |…

A board game die is suspected to be biased. It is rolled $1.000$ times and the following results are obtained:

Face $1$ $2$ $3$ $4$ $5$ $6$
Frequency $118$ $301$ $41$ $229$ $198$ $113$
  • a) Estimate the probability of each face using relative frequencies.

  • b) Calculate the estimated probabilities of "even", "less than $6$" and "rolling $1$ or $2$".

  • c) In view of the estimates, does the die appear to be fair? Justify your answer.

Solve
Practice★★★Not started
State, with reasons, whether each of the following statements about a fair die is true or false: a) "I have gone $20$ rolls without rolling a $5$; by the law of large…

State, with reasons, whether each of the following statements about a fair die is true or false:

  • a) "I have gone $20$ rolls without rolling a $5$; by the law of large numbers, on the next roll it is very likely that a $5$ will appear."

  • b) "Even though no $5$ has appeared in $20$ rolls, the probability of rolling $5$ on the next roll is still $\frac{1}{6}$."

  • c) "If I roll the die $6.000$ times, exactly $1.000$ fives will come up."

Solve

Subjective interpretation

There are events that cannot be repeated under the same conditions and have no known equally likely outcomes: "it will rain tomorrow", "you will pass the exam". Even so, a number between $0$ and $1$ can be assigned to them, based on the knowledge, experience or intuition available.

Continuous probability line graduated from 0 to 1 placing the subjective degree of belief in rain at 0,7 "it will rain tomorrow" ≈ 0,7 0impossible 0,5 1certain
Practice★☆☆Not started
Assign a subjective probability, between $0$ and $1$, to each of the following events and justify your choice: a) "Tomorrow it will rain in your city." b) "You will pass…

Assign a subjective probability, between $0$ and $1$, to each of the following events and justify your choice:

  • a) "Tomorrow it will rain in your city."

  • b) "You will pass the next mathematics exam."

  • c) Explain why in these cases you cannot use either Laplace's rule or relative frequencies.

Solve

Comparing the three interpretations

Comparative diagram of the classical, frequentist and subjective interpretations according to the type of information available: theoretical symmetry, empirical repetition or expert judgement for unique events Classical cases equally likely known Frequentist repeated many times, equally likely or not Subjective unique event, non-repeatable, no model
Practice★★☆Not started
At a secondary school, $400$ randomly chosen students were surveyed, and $268$ state that they practise sport at least twice a week. a) Estimate the probability that a…

At a secondary school, $400$ randomly chosen students were surveyed, and $268$ state that they practise sport at least twice a week.

  • a) Estimate the probability that a student at this school practises sport weekly.

  • b) If the school has $1.200$ students, how many would you expect to practise sport?

  • c) Explain which interpretation of probability you used and why the classical interpretation is not applicable here.

Solve
Practice★★★Not started
An insurance company sets the price of bicycle theft insurance based on its records: out of $20.000$ bicycles insured last year, $340$ were stolen. a) Which…

An insurance company sets the price of bicycle theft insurance based on its records: out of $20.000$ bicycles insured last year, $340$ were stolen.

  • a) Which interpretation of probability does the insurance company use? Reason why the other two interpretations (classical and subjective) would not be suitable.

  • b) Calculate the estimated probability of theft.

  • c) If a bicycle is worth $800\ \text{€}$, calculate the "pure premium" (the price that would cover the risk exactly) and explain why the actual premium will be higher.

Solve

Back to the beginning: For the die you use classical probability ($P(6) = 1/6 \approx 0{,}167$) because its six faces are equally likely; to find out whether it will rain tomorrow you use subjective probability (or frequentist probability through numerical models), assigning a degree of confidence to an unrepeatable atmospheric situation.

Summary

See all the exercises in this section