Indifference Curves and the Optimal Choice
Ximena has $\$120$ for Friday's outing. She can buy tacos and sodas, and she likes both. Many combinations give her the same happiness: 4 tacos with 1 soda, or 3 tacos with 3 sodas... How do we represent that idea on a graph, and how does she choose the best combination she can afford? We solve this in this section.
Combinations That Give the Same Satisfaction
An indifference curve gathers all the combinations of two goods that give the consumer the same satisfaction. He or she is indifferent about which one to choose.
Points A, B, and C are on the same curve $U_1$: they give equal satisfaction. At A there are many sodas and few tacos; at C, the opposite.
Properties of the Curves
There are three properties worth remembering, each with its reason.
-
Negative slope. If you consume less of one good, you need more of the other to keep the same satisfaction.
-
Farther from the origin, more satisfaction. A curve that is higher or farther to the right has more of both goods and, since more is better, gives greater satisfaction.
-
They don't cross. If two curves intersected at a point, that point would have two different levels of satisfaction at the same time, which is impossible.
They are also usually convex (curved toward the origin): someone who already has many tacos will give up several of them for just one more soda, but if few tacos are left, he or she won't give them up as easily. This is the law of diminishing marginal utility seen on the graph.
Say whether each statement about indifference curves is true or false, and justify your answer in one sentence: a) They have a negative slope: to keep the same…
Say whether each statement about indifference curves is true or false, and justify your answer in one sentence:
- a) They have a negative slope: to keep the same satisfaction, if you consume less of one good you must consume more of the other.
- b) Two indifference curves of the same consumer can cross.
- c) The farther a curve is from the origin, the higher the satisfaction it represents.
- d) Indifference curves are straight lines parallel to the axes.
What She Can Buy: The Budget
The curves show what Ximena wants; the budget shows what she can do. With $\$120$, tacos at $\$20$, and sodas at $\$15$, the constraint is:
$$20x + 15y = 120$$where $x$ is tacos and $y$ is sodas. If she spends everything on tacos, she buys 6; if she spends everything on sodas, 8. The line joins those two points.
Points inside the triangle under the line are affordable but leave money over; those outside are unaffordable.
The Optimal Choice
Ximena wants to reach the highest possible curve without going over her budget. If a curve lies entirely outside the line, she can't afford it. If a curve cuts the line at two points, there is another, higher curve that is also affordable. The best point is where the curve just touches the line: the point of tangency.
-
U₁ is affordable, but there are better options: it gives less satisfaction than the optimal point.
-
U₂ touches the line at a single point: it is the best affordable curve.
-
U₃ lies outside: she doesn't have enough money.
At the optimum, the budget is used up (the point is on the line) and the slope of the curve matches the slope of the line.
Ana has $\$120$; each taco costs $\$20$ and each soft drink $\$15$. The graph shows her budget line and two of her indifference curves, $U1$ and $U2…
Ana has $\$120$; each taco costs $\$20$ and each soft drink $\$15$. The graph shows her budget line and two of her indifference curves, $U1$ and $U2$:
- a) Read from the graph the combination marked with the ? sign: how many tacos and how many soft drinks is it? Check that this combination exactly uses up the budget.
- b) Explain why any combination on curve $U_1$ gives her less satisfaction than the marked point, even though it is also affordable.
- c) Could Ana reach an indifference curve higher than $U_2$ with her budget? Explain your reasoning.
Go back to the beginning: Ximena chooses the combination where the highest indifference curve she can afford just touches her budget line.