Wave-Particle Duality: De Broglie and the Photoelectric Effect
In your high school lab you charge a zinc plate negatively and connect it to an electroscope. You shine a very powerful red lamp on it: nothing happens. You switch to a much weaker ultraviolet lamp and the electroscope's leaves drop instantly. Why does the color of the light matter, and not how much total energy it delivers? The answer forces us to think that light arrives in packets. And in 1924 Louis de Broglie turned the idea around: if light can behave like a particle, maybe matter behaves like a wave.
Two faces of light and of matter
A wave model explains why light diffracts and interferes, just like the water in a pool or sound. But that same model can't explain how light knocks electrons out of a metal. For that you need the particle model: photons. Both models are correct, each in its own territory (this is what the CNEYT V curriculum asks for: electromagnetic radiation is modeled as a wave or as photons).
| Explained by the wave model | Explained by the particle model |
|---|---|
| Interference and diffraction of light | Photoelectric effect |
| Polarization | Emission and absorption of energy in packets (atomic spectra) |
In 1924 De Broglie proposed that every material particle (electrons, protons, atoms…) has an associated wave. Later we'll see how it is calculated and why a ball doesn't show off any waves.
Light produces interference and diffraction patterns, like any wave, but when it hits a metal it knocks out electrons as if it were a stream of particles (photons). a)…
Light produces interference and diffraction patterns, like any wave, but when it hits a metal it knocks out electrons as if it were a stream of particles (photons).
- a) Explain in your own words what the wave-particle duality of light consists of.
- b) Name one phenomenon that can only be explained by wave behavior and another that can only be explained by particle behavior.
- c) In $1924$, De Broglie extended the idea to matter: what hypothesis did he propose regarding electrons and other particles?
The photon: light in packets
When you heat a metal, its light goes from red to yellow to white. In the early 20th century, Planck and Einstein saw that light energy is not exchanged in just any amount: it is delivered in indivisible packets.
Since $c = \lambda f$, it can also be written as:
With the simulator, check that, for light in the same medium, if you cut $\lambda$ in half, $f$ doubles and so does the energy of each photon.
A dermatological laser emits light with frequency $f = 4.5\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}$. The energy of a photon is $E_{fotón} = h\times f$, where…
A dermatological laser emits light with frequency $f = 4.5\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}$. The energy of a photon is $E_{fotón} = h\times f$, where $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$.
- a) Calculate the energy of each photon.
- b) If we increase the intensity of the laser without changing its frequency, does the energy of each photon increase? What actually increases?
A laser pointer emits green light with wavelength $\lambda = 550\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and…
A laser pointer emits green light with wavelength $\lambda = 550\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$.
- a) Calculate its frequency, $f = \frac{c}{\lambda}$.
- b) Calculate the energy of each photon, $E_{fotón} = h\times f$.
Sodium vapor street lamps emit light at $\lambda_{Na} = 589\ \text{nm}$ and a blue LED emits at $\lambda_{az} = 470\ \text{nm}$. Given:…
Sodium vapor street lamps emit light at $\lambda_{Na} = 589\ \text{nm}$ and a blue LED emits at $\lambda_{az} = 470\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$. The diagram compares the two waves.
- a) Calculate the energy of a photon of each type of light.
- b) Which of the two photons is more energetic? How many times more?
How many photons arrive per second
A beam of light is like rain: the power depends on how many drops fall per second and on how heavy each drop is. Here the "drops" are photons and their "weight" is $E_{fotón}$.
From photons to electric current
The electric current $I$ is the charge that passes through a point each second. If $N$ electrons pass per second and each one has charge $e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}$, the total charge per second is:
A fiber-optic laser for telecommunications emits at $\lambda = 1.55\ \mu\text{m}$ with a power of $10\ \text{mW}$. Given:…
A fiber-optic laser for telecommunications emits at $\lambda = 1.55\ \mu\text{m}$ with a power of $10\ \text{mW}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$.
- a) Calculate the energy of each photon.
- b) Calculate how many photons the laser emits each second (remember that power is the energy emitted per unit time).
The solar panel of a satellite receives $200\ \text{W}$ of light power from the Sun. As a simplification, assume that all the light has $\lambda = 550\ \text{nm}$.…
The solar panel of a satellite receives $200\ \text{W}$ of light power from the Sun. As a simplification, assume that all the light has $\lambda = 550\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$.
- a) Calculate the energy of each photon.
- b) Calculate how many photons reach the panel each second.
- c) If with the same power the light were redder (larger $\lambda$), would more or fewer photons arrive per second? Justify your answer using the formula $E_{fotón} = \frac{h\times c}{\lambda}$.
A photovoltaic cell receives $5\ \text{mW}$ of light of $\lambda = 600\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$,…
A photovoltaic cell receives $5\ \text{mW}$ of light of $\lambda = 600\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}$.
- a) Calculate how many photons reach the cell each second.
- b) Assuming that each photon releases one electron that reaches the external circuit, calculate the maximum theoretical current (current is charge passing per second).
- c) In practice the current is lower: give two reasons to explain this difference.
- d) If the cell received the same power but from light of $\lambda = 400\ \text{nm}$, would the maximum theoretical current be greater, smaller, or equal? Justify your answer by counting photons.
The photoelectric effect
Let's go back to the zinc plate electroscope. The experiment shows that red light, even if very intense, doesn't knock out electrons, and ultraviolet light, even if weak, does.
The explanation works photon by photon: an electron absorbs one photon, whole and all at once. If that photon doesn't carry the minimum energy needed to free it, there is no emission, no matter how many photons arrive.
Back to the beginning: the ultraviolet lamp discharges the zinc because each UV photon has more energy than the $W$ of zinc; the red photons, however many there are, individually don't reach it.
In the laboratory, a negatively charged zinc plate is connected to an electroscope. When illuminated with ultraviolet light, the electroscope discharges; with very…
In the laboratory, a negatively charged zinc plate is connected to an electroscope. When illuminated with ultraviolet light, the electroscope discharges; with very intense red light, it does not. The diagram shows the experimental set-up.
- a) What is the photoelectric effect?
- b) What are photoelectrons?
- c) Explain, using the concept that light arrives in photons, why red light does not discharge the plate no matter how intense it is.
In the photoelectric effect, each metal has a work function $W$ (also called extraction work) and a threshold frequency $f_0$ satisfying $W = h\times f_0$. a) Explain…
In the photoelectric effect, each metal has a work function $W$ (also called extraction work) and a threshold frequency $f_0$ satisfying $W = h\times f_0$.
- a) Explain what the work function means: what energy does it represent?
- b) What is the threshold frequency and what happens when the incident light has $f < f_0$?
- c) If $f > f_0$, what happens to the remaining photon energy after the electron is emitted?
Einstein's equation: calculations with electronvolts
When $f > f_0$, the energy balance for a single photon and a single electron is:
The values of $W$ almost always come in electronvolts (eV), a convenient unit at the atomic scale:
$$1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$$A potassium photocell has a work function of $W = 2.3\ \text{eV}$ and is illuminated with ultraviolet light of $\lambda = 250\ \text{nm}$. Given:…
A potassium photocell has a work function of $W = 2.3\ \text{eV}$ and is illuminated with ultraviolet light of $\lambda = 250\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$. The diagram shows the schematic of the process.
- a) Express the work function in joules.
- b) Calculate the energy of each photon of ultraviolet light.
- c) Apply $E_{fotón} = W + E_{c,máx}$ and calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, in joules and in electronvolts.
The light detector of a telescope uses a caesium cell, whose work function is $W = 2.1\ \text{eV}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$,…
The light detector of a telescope uses a caesium cell, whose work function is $W = 2.1\ \text{eV}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$.
- a) Calculate the threshold frequency of caesium, $f_0 = \frac{W}{h}$.
- b) Calculate the threshold wavelength, $\lambda_0 = \frac{c}{f_0}$.
- c) Will red light of $\lambda = 650\ \text{nm}$ emit electrons? Calculate this by comparing energies and explain your answer.
Light of $\lambda = 350\ \text{nm}$ is incident on a calcium plate with a work function of $W = 2.9\ \text{eV}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$,…
Light of $\lambda = 350\ \text{nm}$ is incident on a calcium plate with a work function of $W = 2.9\ \text{eV}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$.
- a) Calculate the photon energy in joules and express it in electronvolts.
- b) Determine whether photoelectron emission occurs.
- c) If so, calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons.
Stopping potential
How do you measure the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons? A collector with a voltage that slows them down is placed in front of the plate. That voltage is raised until not even the fastest electron gets through: that value is the stopping potential $V_f$.
A metal with work function $W = 2.25\ \text{eV}$ is illuminated with light of $\lambda = 300\ \text{nm}$. The photoelectrons are slowed down by a potential difference…
A metal with work function $W = 2.25\ \text{eV}$ is illuminated with light of $\lambda = 300\ \text{nm}$. The photoelectrons are slowed down by a potential difference until even the fastest one does not reach the collector (stopping potential $V_f$, with $E_{c,máx} = e\times V_f$). Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, $e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$. The diagram shows the set-up with the stopping potential.
- a) Calculate the photon energy and the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, in electronvolts.
- b) Calculate the stopping potential.
- c) Repeat the calculation with light of $\lambda = 250\ \text{nm}$: how do the maximum kinetic energy and the stopping potential change?
- d) Explain why doubling the light intensity, without changing its wavelength, does not change the stopping potential, even though it increases the number of photoelectrons.
A laboratory group measures the photoelectric effect on a metal and obtains two data points: with light of frequency $f_1 = 6.0\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}$ there is no…
A laboratory group measures the photoelectric effect on a metal and obtains two data points: with light of frequency $f_1 = 6.0\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}$ there is no emission at all (it is the threshold frequency) and with $f_2 = 1.0\times10^{15}\ \text{Hz}$ photoelectrons leave with $E_{c,máx} = 2.65\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$. The diagram shows the two data points from the experiment.
- a) Calculate the work function of the metal from $W = h\times f_1$ and express it in electronvolts.
- b) Mentally sketch $E_{c,máx}$ against $f$: using $E_{c,máx} = h\times f - W$, calculate the gradient of the straight line through the two points and check that it matches the value of $h$.
- c) Predict, without measuring again, the maximum kinetic energy for light of $f = 1.2\times10^{15}\ \text{Hz}$.
- d) Explain what quantity the y-intercept of the straight line represents and why it is negative.
A zinc plate, with a work function of $W = 4.3\ \text{eV}$, is illuminated alternately with red light of $650\ \text{nm}$ and ultraviolet light of $250\ \text{nm}$.…
A zinc plate, with a work function of $W = 4.3\ \text{eV}$, is illuminated alternately with red light of $650\ \text{nm}$ and ultraviolet light of $250\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$.
- a) Calculate the energy of each type of photon and determine, with justification, which light causes emission.
- b) For the light that produces emission, calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons and the corresponding stopping potential.
- c) If we multiply the intensity of the red light by a thousand, will we succeed in knocking out electrons from the zinc? Explain your answer using the photon model: how do a thousand red photons differ from one ultraviolet photon?
- d) If we increase the intensity of the ultraviolet light, what changes and what stays the same in the emission?
De Broglie: matter as a wave
Why would this be reasonable? For a photon, $p = E/c = h/\lambda$. De Broglie applied the same relation to material particles.
Every particle has an associated De Broglie wavelength, $\lambda = \frac{h}{m\times v}$, where $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$. A tennis ball of mass…
Every particle has an associated De Broglie wavelength, $\lambda = \frac{h}{m\times v}$, where $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$. A tennis ball of mass $58\ \text{g}$ leaves a serve at $40\ \text{m/s}$.
- a) Calculate its De Broglie wavelength.
- b) Compare the result with the size of an atom ($10^{-10}\ \text{m}$) and explain why this wave has no observable consequences.
In a cathode-ray tube, electrons move at $v = 10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and mass of an electron…
In a cathode-ray tube, electrons move at $v = 10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and mass of an electron $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$.
- a) Calculate the De Broglie wavelength associated with each electron, $\lambda = \frac{h}{m_e\times v}$.
- b) Compare the result with the typical size of an atom ($10^{-10}\ \text{m}$) and comment on why the wave associated with the electron is relevant in the atomic world.
In an accelerator, an electron and a proton move at the same speed, $v = 10^{5}\ \text{m/s}$. Given: $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$,…
In an accelerator, an electron and a proton move at the same speed, $v = 10^{5}\ \text{m/s}$. Given: $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$, $m_p = 1.67\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}$ and $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$.
- a) Calculate the De Broglie wavelength of the electron.
- b) Calculate that of the proton.
- c) Calculate the ratio $\frac{\lambda_e}{\lambda_p}$ and explain, using De Broglie's formula, why at the same speed the more massive particle has a shorter associated wavelength.
Accelerated electrons
In an electron microscope or a cathode-ray tube, electrons are accelerated by a potential difference $V$ (voltage). If they start from rest and there are no losses, all the electrical energy becomes kinetic:
You can also go the other way: if you are given the $\lambda$ you need, solve for $v = h/(m_e\lambda)$ and then $E_c = \tfrac12 m_e v^2$.
In an electron microscopy experiment, an electron has a kinetic energy of $100\ \text{eV}$. Given: $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$,…
In an electron microscopy experiment, an electron has a kinetic energy of $100\ \text{eV}$. Given: $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$, $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$ and $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$.
- a) Express its kinetic energy in joules.
- b) Calculate its speed using $E_c = \frac{1}{2}\times m_e\times v^2$.
- c) Calculate its De Broglie wavelength.
For a certain diffraction experiment, the electrons must have a De Broglie wavelength of $1\ \text{nm}$. Given: $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$,…
For a certain diffraction experiment, the electrons must have a De Broglie wavelength of $1\ \text{nm}$. Given: $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$, $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$.
- a) Rearrange $\lambda = \frac{h}{m_e\times v}$ for speed and calculate the speed at which they must move.
- b) Calculate their kinetic energy, in joules and in electronvolts.
In a transmission electron microscope, electrons are accelerated through a potential difference $V = 10\ \text{kV}$, gaining a kinetic energy $E_c = e\times V$ (ignore…
In a transmission electron microscope, electrons are accelerated through a potential difference $V = 10\ \text{kV}$, gaining a kinetic energy $E_c = e\times V$ (ignore relativistic corrections). Given: $e = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}$, $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$ and $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$.
- a) Calculate the kinetic energy acquired by each electron, in joules.
- b) Calculate its speed.
- c) Calculate its De Broglie wavelength.
- d) The resolving power of a microscope improves as the wavelength used decreases: compare the wavelength obtained with that of visible light ($\lambda \approx 500\ \text{nm}$) and explain why an electron microscope can resolve viruses while an optical microscope cannot.
Electron diffraction and the double slit
If you shoot marbles at two slits, you get two bands. But with electrons, alternating fringes appear, with zones where none ever arrives. It is the interference pattern of two waves.
Crystals and slits
For diffraction to occur, the opening must be comparable to $\lambda$. The planes of a crystal are separated by about $10^{-10}\ \text{m}$, and they are the natural "slit" for electrons with a $\lambda$ of that order. For a ball, with $\lambda \sim 10^{-34}\ \text{m}$, no real opening is comparable: diffraction is impossible.
A tennis ball of $58\ \text{g}$ leaves a serve at $40\ \text{m/s}$; in an accelerator, an electron moves at $10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$. Given:…
A tennis ball of $58\ \text{g}$ leaves a serve at $40\ \text{m/s}$; in an accelerator, an electron moves at $10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$ and $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$.
- a) Calculate the De Broglie wavelength of the ball and that of the electron.
- b) To observe diffraction, the aperture must be comparable to the wavelength: indicate what slit size would be needed in each case.
- c) The planes of a crystal are separated by about $10^{-10}\ \text{m}$: determine which of the two objects can be diffracted by a crystal.
- d) Conclude why wave-like effects are not observable in practice for macroscopic objects, supporting your answer with the figures above.
A caesium cell, with a work function of $W = 2.1\ \text{eV}$, is illuminated with light of $\lambda = 400\ \text{nm}$. Given:…
A caesium cell, with a work function of $W = 2.1\ \text{eV}$, is illuminated with light of $\lambda = 400\ \text{nm}$. Given: $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$, $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$ and $1\ \text{eV} = 1.6\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$.
- a) Calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, in joules.
- b) Calculate the speed of those fastest electrons.
- c) Calculate the De Broglie wavelength associated with those electrons.
- d) Atomic planes in a crystal are separated by about $10^{-10}\ \text{m}$: determine whether this crystal could act as a diffraction grating for these electrons and what evidence an electron diffraction experiment on a crystal would provide.
In a double-slit experiment with electrons, the electrons move at $v = 2\times10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$, the slits are separated by $d = 0.5\ \mu\text{m}$, and the screen is…
In a double-slit experiment with electrons, the electrons move at $v = 2\times10^{6}\ \text{m/s}$, the slits are separated by $d = 0.5\ \mu\text{m}$, and the screen is at $L = 1\ \text{m}$. The separation between consecutive maxima in the pattern is $\Delta y = \frac{\lambda\times L}{d}$. Given: $m_e = 9.11\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}$ and $h = 6.63\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\times\text{s}$. The diagram shows the double-slit set-up.
- a) Calculate the De Broglie wavelength of the electrons.
- b) Calculate the separation between maxima on the screen and express it in millimeters.
- c) If electrons are sent one by one, the interference pattern still forms over time: explain what this result means regarding wave-particle duality and the probabilistic nature of quantum physics.
- d) Predict what happens to the separation between maxima if the electrons are accelerated to twice the speed.