Principles of special relativity
If you throw a ball forwards from a moving train, its velocity relative to the platform is the sum of the train's velocity and the throwing velocity: you have known that since 1st Bachillerato. But if, instead of a ball, you switch on a lamp, the light that leaves it does not reach the platform at "the speed of the train plus $c$": it arrives at exactly $c$, not one metre per second more. That difference, which seems like a detail, forces us to rebuild the ideas of time, space and simultaneity from scratch. This is how the special theory of relativity was born, published by Einstein in 1905.
Einstein's two postulates
At the end of the 19th century, the Michelson–Morley experiment tried to measure how the speed of light changed depending on the Earth's motion relative to the supposed aether, but it always obtained the same value in every direction: how could the speed of a wave not depend on the motion of the person measuring it?
The second postulate is the one that breaks with intuition. If a spaceship moves away from the Earth and switches on a headlamp at its bow, an observer on Earth does not measure $c + v_{\text{ship}}$: they measure $c$, just as if the ship were stationary. For this to be compatible with the ship also measuring $c$ for its own light, something else has to change: time and space are no longer absolute.
Albert Einstein published the special theory of relativity in 1905 based on two postulates. a) State in your own words the first postulate, known as the principle of…
Albert Einstein published the special theory of relativity in 1905 based on two postulates.
- a) State in your own words the first postulate, known as the principle of relativity.
- b) State the second postulate, concerning the speed of light in a vacuum.
- c) State to which type of reference frames the special theory of relativity applies.
State which of the following reference frames can be considered inertial and justify each answer: a) A train braking as it enters a station. b) A space probe travelling…
State which of the following reference frames can be considered inertial and justify each answer:
- a) A train braking as it enters a station.
- b) A space probe travelling through deep space at a constant velocity.
- c) A laboratory centrifuge rotating at a constant angular velocity.
- d) A train station at rest relative to the ground.
The Michelson–Morley experiment (1887) aimed to measure the speed of the Earth relative to the "aether", the medium through which light was supposed to propagate, by…
The Michelson–Morley experiment (1887) aimed to measure the speed of the Earth relative to the "aether", the medium through which light was supposed to propagate, by comparing the speed of light in perpendicular directions. The diagram shows the interferometer used.
- a) What result did they obtain?
- b) Why is this result incompatible with the classical addition of velocities?
- c) Which of Einstein's postulates incorporates this, and what happened to the aether hypothesis?
The addition of velocities stops being a sum
A passenger on a train travelling at $30\ \text{m/s}$ throws a ball forward at $10\ \text{m/s}$ relative to the train. a) According to the Galilean transformation, with…
A passenger on a train travelling at $30\ \text{m/s}$ throws a ball forward at $10\ \text{m/s}$ relative to the train.
- a) According to the Galilean transformation, with what velocity does an observer on the platform see the ball moving?
- b) Write down the addition of velocities rule from classical physics that you used.
A spacecraft moves away from the Earth at $0,6c$, that is, $1,8 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, and turns on a bow headlight (given: $c = 3 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$). The…
A spacecraft moves away from the Earth at $0,6c$, that is, $1,8 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, and turns on a bow headlight (given: $c = 3 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$). The diagram summarizes the situation.
- a) What speed would classical physics predict for the light from the headlight as measured from Earth?
- b) What speed does an observer on Earth actually measure?
- c) What speed would that same observer measure if the light source were at the stern, pointing towards the Earth? Justify your answer using the second postulate.
The relativistic addition of velocities is $u = \frac{u' + v}{1 + \frac{u' \cdot v}{c^2}}$, where $u'$ is the velocity of an object relative to a moving frame and $v$ is…
The relativistic addition of velocities is $u = \frac{u' + v}{1 + \frac{u' \cdot v}{c^2}}$, where $u'$ is the velocity of an object relative to a moving frame and $v$ is the velocity of the moving frame relative to the ground. A spacecraft moves away from Earth at $v = 0,8c$ and launches a probe forwards at $u' = 0,5c$ relative to the spacecraft.
- a) Calculate the speed of the probe measured from Earth using Galileo's classical formula.
- b) Calculate it using the relativistic formula (you may work directly in units of $c$).
- c) Verify that the relativistic result is less than $c$ and show, by substituting $u' = c$ into the formula, that if the probe were moving at the speed of light relative to the spacecraft, it would also be measured at $c$ from Earth.
The end of absolute time and space
In classical physics, two events that are simultaneous for one observer are simultaneous for everyone: time is the same universal clock for all. The second postulate destroys that idea.
A very fast train passes a platform. At the instant when the centre of the train aligns with an observer on the platform, this observer sees two simultaneous flashes…
A very fast train passes a platform. At the instant when the centre of the train aligns with an observer on the platform, this observer sees two simultaneous flashes emitted from the ends of the train.
- a) Will a passenger sitting in the centre of the train also see them as simultaneous?
- b) Reason your answer, taking into account that the train is moving towards one of the flashes and that light from both flashes travels at $c$ for the passenger as well.
Einstein's thought experiment: two lightning bolts strike the ends of a train carriage just as its centre passes an observer on the platform, who sees both strikes at…
Einstein's thought experiment: two lightning bolts strike the ends of a train carriage just as its centre passes an observer on the platform, who sees both strikes at the same time. A passenger is standing in the centre of the carriage. The diagram represents the situation.
- a) Describe what the passenger sees and explain why, using the fact that for her, the light from both strikes also travels at $c$ while she moves towards one of them.
- b) What is this phenomenon called, where two events simultaneous for one observer are not simultaneous for another?
- c) Draw a conclusion about the existence of a universal "now" valid for the entire galaxy.
Why can nothing with mass reach the speed of light?
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) accelerates protons to $0,9999c$, but however much energy continues to be supplied to them, they never reach $c$: that extra energy no longer translates into more speed, but into more relativistic kinetic energy (you will see this in the next section).
Can an object with mass reach the speed of light in a vacuum? Answer and justify your response, taking into account the second postulate and the fact that the energy…
Can an object with mass reach the speed of light in a vacuum? Answer and justify your response, taking into account the second postulate and the fact that the energy required to continue accelerating the object would grow without limit as its speed approaches $c$.
In the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), protons reach speeds of $0,9999c$ (given: $c = 3 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$). a) Calculate the speed of the proton in $\text{m/s}$. b)…
In the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), protons reach speeds of $0,9999c$ (given: $c = 3 \cdot 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$).
- a) Calculate the speed of the proton in $\text{m/s}$.
- b) Calculate how many $\text{m/s}$ it lacks to reach $c$.
- c) The accelerator continues to supply energy to the proton and yet it never reaches $c$. Explain why and how this extra energy manifests itself.
Supersonic aircraft exceed the speed of sound in air, but no object with mass can reach or exceed the speed of light in a vacuum. a) How does the sound barrier differ…
Supersonic aircraft exceed the speed of sound in air, but no object with mass can reach or exceed the speed of light in a vacuum.
- a) How does the sound barrier differ physically from the speed-of-light barrier? Think about the medium through which each signal propagates and which postulate supports one of them.
- b) Justify, in terms of energy, why reaching $c$ is impossible for an object with mass and is not merely a technical difficulty like the sound barrier was.