Sources, bias and science in society
You scroll through your phone and see: "This new tea cures colds in one day!" Do you believe it? Scientists don't. They ask questions first. In this page you will learn which questions to ask, and why science is still worth trusting even though its ideas can change.
Is this source reliable?
A source is where information comes from: a website, a newspaper, a video, a textbook, a scientific paper. Not all sources are equally trustworthy. Before you believe a science claim, check the source.
Here are six good questions to ask. The diagram shows the main ideas in four boxes:
-
Who wrote it? Is the author an expert in this area?
-
Who paid for it? Does the author or company gain money if you believe it?
-
What is the evidence? Are there data, or only opinions and stories?
-
How was the evidence collected? How many people or samples? Was it a fair test?
-
Can it be checked? Does it name the original study so that others can look it up?
-
Do other sources agree? Have other scientists found the same result?
Give two questions you should ask to decide whether a source of science information is reliable.
Give two questions you should ask to decide whether a source of science information is reliable.
Compare two sources about recycling in Ireland: a government environmental agency report and an advertisement from a company that sells recycled products. a) Which…
Compare two sources about recycling in Ireland: a government environmental agency report and an advertisement from a company that sells recycled products.
- a) Which source is more likely to be unbiased? Explain.
- b) State one way in which science helps society to reduce waste.
Bias and weak evidence
Bias means presenting information in an unfair way that favours one side. It can be deliberate or accidental.
Common types of bias and weakness:
-
Money: a company reports only the results that help to sell its product.
-
Small sample: a study of 12 students may not show what is true for all teenagers. Larger samples are more reliable.
-
Self-selected sample: if people choose to reply to a survey, they are often the ones with strong opinions.
-
No control group: without a group that does not get the treatment, you cannot tell what caused the change.
-
Emotional or exaggerated language: words like "deadly" or "miracle" are not scientific.
-
Correlation is not cause: two things happening together does not prove one causes the other.
What is meant by bias in a science report? Give one example.
What is meant by bias in a science report? Give one example.
A social media post claims: "Drinking a new herbal tea cures colds in one day." It was posted by a company that sells the tea and gives no evidence. a) Identify two…
A social media post claims: "Drinking a new herbal tea cures colds in one day." It was posted by a company that sells the tea and gives no evidence.
- a) Identify two reasons to be cautious about this claim.
- b) Describe how a scientist could test the claim fairly.
A newspaper headline reads: "Chocolate makes teenagers cleverer!" The article is based on a study of 12 students in one school. a) Comment on the sample size. b) Why…
A newspaper headline reads: "Chocolate makes teenagers cleverer!" The article is based on a study of 12 students in one school.
- a) Comment on the sample size.
- b) Why might the headline be misleading?
- c) Suggest how the study could be improved.
A television programme states that a new energy drink "improves exam results by 20%". The programme was paid for by the drink's maker. The data come from a survey of 30…
A television programme states that a new energy drink "improves exam results by 20%". The programme was paid for by the drink's maker. The data come from a survey of 30 customers who chose to reply.
- a) Identify three weaknesses in the evidence.
- b) Explain how a fair trial would be designed, including a control group.
- c) Discuss why the funding source matters even if the data are correct.
Careful language and checking the original
Scientists choose words carefully. Compare two reports of the same air pollution study in Dublin:
| Report | Wording | Type |
|---|---|---|
| A | "Air in the city is deadly." | Vague, emotional, no numbers |
| B | "Air pollution was 12% above the recommended level on 5 days of the year." | Precise, measurable, can be checked |
Report B is more precise because it gives numbers, a time period and a comparison. Report A makes a big claim ("deadly") that the data do not show: being 12% above a limit on 5 days does not mean the air is deadly all year.
A conclusion must be supported by the data. Ask: does the evidence really show this?
How can you check the original study?
-
Look for the name of the study, the scientists and the organisation (for example a university or Met Éireann).
-
Search for the original report rather than relying on a news summary.
-
Check the numbers: how many days, how many places, how was it measured?
-
See whether other scientists have reached similar results.
Two news websites report on the same study about air pollution in Dublin. Website A writes: "Air in the city is deadly." Website B writes: "Air pollution was 12% above…
Two news websites report on the same study about air pollution in Dublin. Website A writes: "Air in the city is deadly." Website B writes: "Air pollution was 12% above the recommended level on 5 days of the year."
- a) Which report uses more precise language? Justify.
- b) Evaluate whether either report makes a scientific conclusion that the data support.
- c) Suggest how readers can check the original study.
Science changes and serves society
Scientific ideas are not fixed forever. When scientists find new evidence, they test it, and if it holds up they change or improve the idea. This is a strength of science, not a weakness. It shows scientists follow the evidence rather than defending old opinions.
Scientists also publish their methods and results. Other scientists then review them (this is called peer review), repeat the experiments and look for mistakes. This makes science more reliable and lets knowledge build up over time.
Science also affects everyday life:
-
Vaccines have greatly reduced diseases such as measles and polio.
-
Water treatment makes tap water safe to drink.
-
Recycling research helps reduce waste going to landfill.
Many developments have benefits and concerns. For example, plastics are cheap, light and hygienic, but plastic waste harms rivers and the sea. Society must weigh the benefits against ethical and environmental concerns, and science provides the evidence to help decide.
Famous scientists show how science helps society. For example, Ernest Walton, from Dungarvan, Co. Waterford, and John Cockcroft were the first to split the atom, using a particle accelerator they built (1932). Jocelyn Bell Burnell, born in Belfast, discovered pulsars. Marie Curie studied radioactivity and her work led to cancer treatments.
Name one scientist, Irish or international, and describe one contribution they made to science or to society.
Name one scientist, Irish or international, and describe one contribution they made to science or to society.
Scientific knowledge can change when new evidence is found. Vaccines, for example, have changed how society deals with disease. a) Explain why it is not a weakness of…
Scientific knowledge can change when new evidence is found. Vaccines, for example, have changed how society deals with disease.
- a) Explain why it is not a weakness of science that its conclusions may change over time.
- b) Discuss one way in which a scientific development has had both benefits and ethical or environmental concerns for society.
- c) Explain why scientists publish their methods and results for others to review.
Back to the start: you now know why a cold-cure claim from the company that sells the tea should not be believed. You would ask who paid, what the evidence is, how large the sample was and whether others have checked it.