Hypotheses, Theories, and Laws
Your friend says, "Evolution? That's only a theory." Is she right to brush it off? In science, the words hypothesis, theory, and law have exact meanings, and they are not the ones we use in everyday talk. By the end of this page you will be able to answer her.
Hypotheses: testable explanations
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that can be tested. It is not a wild guess. It is an educated prediction based on what you already know or have observed.
"Testable" means you can collect evidence that could show the idea is wrong. If no possible result could ever disagree with the statement, it is not a scientific hypothesis.
Many hypotheses are written in "If… then…" form:
If bean plants get more light each day, then they will grow taller in two weeks.
Notice that this statement names something you can change (the light) and something you can measure (the height).
In your own words, define a scientific hypothesis. Then explain what makes a hypothesis "testable," and give one example of a testable hypothesis about plant growth.
In your own words, define a scientific hypothesis. Then explain what makes a hypothesis "testable," and give one example of a testable hypothesis about plant growth.
A student asks each of the following questions. For each one, state whether it can be answered by a scientific investigation, and if not, explain why. a) Do goldfish eat…
A student asks each of the following questions. For each one, state whether it can be answered by a scientific investigation, and if not, explain why.
- a) Do goldfish eat more food in warm water than in cold water?
- b) Which flavor of ice cream is the most delicious?
- c) Does the amount of light affect the rate of photosynthesis in elodea?
For the questions that are testable, rewrite one as an "If... then..." hypothesis.
Theories and laws
In daily life, "theory" often means a hunch: "My theory is that the bus is late because of the rain." In science it means something much stronger.
| Hypothesis | Theory | Law | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | A testable explanation or prediction | A well-tested explanation | A description of a pattern |
| Evidence | Being tested | Large amount, many sources | Repeated observations |
| Example | "If salt water is used, then beans will grow shorter." | Cell theory, evolution by natural selection | Law of conservation of mass |
Two ideas students often get wrong:
Back to the start: your friend's "only a theory" mixes up the everyday meaning (a hunch) with the scientific meaning (a well-supported explanation). Evolution by natural selection is supported by fossils, DNA comparisons, and observed changes such as antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Decide whether each statement describes a scientific hypothesis, a scientific theory, or a scientific law. Write one short sentence to justify each choice. a) Cell…
Decide whether each statement describes a scientific hypothesis, a scientific theory, or a scientific law. Write one short sentence to justify each choice.
- a) Cell theory states that all living things are made of cells and that cells come from pre-existing cells.
- b) "If I water bean plants with salt water, then they will grow shorter than plants watered with fresh water."
- c) The law of conservation of mass states that matter is neither created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction.
Many people say, "It's only a theory," when they doubt an idea. Explain why this use of the word "theory" is different from how scientists use it. In your answer,…
Many people say, "It's only a theory," when they doubt an idea. Explain why this use of the word "theory" is different from how scientists use it. In your answer, describe how a scientific theory differs from a hypothesis, and give one example of a well-supported theory in biology.
For centuries, scientists have refined the explanation for how species change over time. Evolution by natural selection is supported by evidence from fossils, DNA…
For centuries, scientists have refined the explanation for how species change over time. Evolution by natural selection is supported by evidence from fossils, DNA comparisons, and direct observation of populations such as bacteria that become antibiotic resistant.
- a) Explain why this explanation is called a theory and not a law.
- b) Describe how a theory differs from a law in what each one does for science.
- c) Argue what would happen to a well-supported theory if new evidence contradicted it. Use the idea that scientific knowledge is tentative but reliable.
Three types of investigations
Not every study is an experiment. Scientists choose the method that fits the question.
| Type | What you do | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive | Collect data and record observations without making comparisons | Counting frogs at a pond each day |
| Comparative | Compare data from groups where a variable is manipulated or differs | Comparing plant growth under red light and blue light |
| Experimental | Like comparative, but a control is identified | Comparing fertilizer groups with a water-only control |
Mateo watches a pond for two weeks and records the number of frogs he sees each day, the water temperature, and the weather. He does not change anything about the pond.…
Mateo watches a pond for two weeks and records the number of frogs he sees each day, the water temperature, and the weather. He does not change anything about the pond. Is this a descriptive, comparative, or experimental investigation? Explain your answer in one or two sentences.
Designing a fair experiment
An experiment tests one change at a time so you know what caused the result.
Aaliyah wants to know whether the brand of fertilizer affects the height of tomato plants. She sets up 12 identical pots with the same soil and the same type of tomato…
Aaliyah wants to know whether the brand of fertilizer affects the height of tomato plants. She sets up 12 identical pots with the same soil and the same type of tomato seedling. Four pots receive Brand A, four receive Brand B, and four receive only water. All pots get the same sunlight and 100 mL of water every two days. After 30 days she measures plant height in centimeters.
- a) Identify the independent variable and the dependent variable.
- b) Identify the control group.
- c) List two constants (controlled variables).
Priya hypothesizes that a new sports drink improves reaction time. She recruits 10 volunteers. All 10 drink the sports drink and then take a computer reaction test.…
Priya hypothesizes that a new sports drink improves reaction time. She recruits 10 volunteers. All 10 drink the sports drink and then take a computer reaction test. Their average reaction time is 0.21 s. She concludes that the drink improves reaction time.
- a) Identify at least three flaws in her experimental design.
- b) Redesign the experiment so it supports a valid conclusion. Name the independent variable, dependent variable, control group, and at least three constants.
- c) Explain why increasing the number of volunteers would strengthen the conclusion.
Science and other kinds of questions
Science answers questions that can be tested with evidence. "Do goldfish eat more in warm water?" can be measured. "Which ice cream flavor is the most delicious?" is a matter of opinion. Ethical and social questions, such as whether a technology should be used, depend on values, so science can inform them but cannot settle them alone.
Summary
-
A hypothesis is a testable, falsifiable explanation or prediction, often written "If… then…".
-
A theory is a well-supported explanation based on a lot of evidence. A law describes a pattern. Theories do not become laws.
-
Investigations can be descriptive, comparative, or experimental (with a control).
-
A fair experiment has one independent variable, a measured dependent variable, a control group, constants, and enough samples.
-
Scientific knowledge is tentative but reliable. Strong theories can be revised by new evidence.