Behavioral economics
"Was $\$120$, now $\$79$" on a jacket at the mall, even though it was never actually sold for $\$120$. The sign doesn't lie about the final price, but it plays with something much harder to see: how your brain makes decisions.
Cognitive biases: we are not calculators
Biases also show up in how we handle money and investments. Employer stock bias: putting too much of your 401(k) into your own company's stock, so your paycheck and your savings both depend on one company. Home bias: favoring companies from your own country or town just because they feel familiar. Mental accounting: treating money differently depending on its label, like spending a tax refund or birthday cash more freely than money from a paycheck, even though a dollar is a dollar. A good way to avoid these: diversify with an index fund and ask, "Would I make this choice if this money came from my paycheck?"
Loss aversion in investing: a falling market hurts more than a rising one pleases, so many people panic and sell after a drop, locking in the loss, and then miss the recovery. For example, Emma has $\$1{,}000$ in an index fund that falls to $\$800$. If she sells, she makes the $\$200$ loss permanent. If she holds, she still owns the same shares, which can recover. A good way to avoid this: set a long-term plan in advance, invest automatically, and check your account less often.
Explain what behavioral economics studies and how its view of people differs from that of the rational decision-maker model.
Explain what behavioral economics studies and how its view of people differs from that of the rational decision-maker model.
Explain what a cognitive bias is and why we are "born with" them. Describe a bias you have experienced in a real or imagined purchase (a sale, a fashion trend, a…
Explain what a cognitive bias is and why we are "born with" them. Describe a bias you have experienced in a real or imagined purchase (a sale, a fashion trend, a repeated opinion) and how it changed your decision.
"Biases are not foolish: they were useful once." Discuss this statement: reason in what contexts following the majority (social proof) or fleeing from losses could have…
"Biases are not foolish: they were useful once." Discuss this statement: reason in what contexts following the majority (social proof) or fleeing from losses could have been a good strategy, and explain why those same shortcuts fail in a supermarket, a social network or an investment app.
The anchoring effect and framing
Stores use this all the time: "was/now" list prices, charm pricing ($\$9.99$ feels much cheaper than $\$10$), and "20% off" versus "$\$10$ off" (the same discount can feel bigger or smaller depending on the wording). To compare fairly, check the unit price and the final price.
A store displays a jacket with the sign "was $\$120$, now $\$79$", even though it was never actually sold for $\$120…
A store displays a jacket with the sign "was $\$120$, now $\$79$", even though it was never actually sold for $\$120$. Identify which psychological bias this sign exploits and explain how it works.
At a street market you ask the price of a lamp and the seller says "fifty, but for you thirty". Explain what the anchoring effect is and how the seller is using it: why…
At a street market you ask the price of a lamp and the seller says "fifty, but for you thirty". Explain what the anchoring effect is and how the seller is using it: why does $\$30$ seem cheap to you even though the lamp is worth $\$20$?
The figure shows the result of a classroom experiment: group $1$ was first shown a backpack marked 'was $\$60$' and group $2$ the same backpack marked 'was $\$30$'; then…
The figure shows the result of a classroom experiment: group $1$ was first shown a backpack marked 'was $\$60$' and group $2$ the same backpack marked 'was $\$30$'; then everyone was asked to say how much they would pay for it.
- a) Interpret the results: what effect is observed and what is it called?
- b) What advice would you give a consumer to protect themselves from this effect?
An online store offers "free shipping on orders over $\$30$". You wanted a $\$22$ product and shipping costs $\$4$; to avoid it you add something else for $\$9$ that you…
An online store offers "free shipping on orders over $\$30$". You wanted a $\$22$ product and shipping costs $\$4$; to avoid it you add something else for $\$9$ that you did not need to your cart.
- a) How much extra have you spent to "save" the shipping fee? Do the calculation.
- b) What biases has the store used? Explain how the "free" hook and the aversion to paying for shipping work together.
One yogurt is advertised as "$90\ \%$ fat-free"; another, identical, would say "contains $10\ \%$ fat". Most people perceive the first as healthier. a) What does this…
One yogurt is advertised as "$90\ \%$ fat-free"; another, identical, would say "contains $10\ \%$ fat". Most people perceive the first as healthier.
- a) What does this example show about how the frame (framing) in which the same information is presented matters?
- b) Give an example of framing in economic news ("unemployment falls" versus "employment rises only slightly") and explain what effect it has on the reader's mood.
Loss aversion and present bias
'Losing $\$10…
'Losing $\$10$ hurts more than finding them brings joy.' Explain which bias this phrase refers to and describe a situation in your everyday life where this bias changes a decision.
In an experiment, one group is given a mug and then asked for how much they would sell it; another group is asked how much they would pay for the same mug. Sellers ask,…
In an experiment, one group is given a mug and then asked for how much they would sell it; another group is asked how much they would pay for the same mug. Sellers ask, on average, twice as much as buyers offer.
- a) Which behavioral economics bias does the result show? Name it and define it in your own words.
- b) Which prediction of the classical rational model does this result contradict? Explain the contradiction.
Many people prefer $\$10$ today over $\$12$ in a week, but prefer $\$12$ in $53$ weeks over $\$10$ in $52$ weeks, even though the extra wait is the same: one week. a)…
Many people prefer $\$10$ today over $\$12$ in a week, but prefer $\$12$ in $53$ weeks over $\$10$ in $52$ weeks, even though the extra wait is the same: one week.
- a) Explain what inconsistency those two choices show (we prefer immediacy to an exaggerated degree).
- b) Relate this bias to how hard it is to save or study in advance, and mention one trick to overcome it (prior commitments, automating saving).
Liam joins a gym in January and must choose between two subscription options: Option A (Fixed annual fee): $\$360…
Liam joins a gym in January and must choose between two subscription options:
-
Option A (Fixed annual fee): $\$360$ in a single non-refundable payment (equivalent to $\$30$ per month).
-
Option B (Flexible pass): $\$5$ per individual session through reloadable passes with no minimum commitment.
Liam plans to attend $3$ days a week (about $12$ times a month). However, aggregate statistics from the facility show that clients with his profile attend an average of $14$ times a month in January and February, but drop to just $2$ monthly visits from March to December. In addition, many admit that in the spring they go "reluctantly and feeling forced just to avoid throwing money away".
- a) Calculate the cost per session that Liam expects to pay based on his forecast under Option A, and compare it with the actual average cost per session he will end up paying if his actual attendance follows the statistical average over the $12$ months.
- b) Explain how the overconfidence (or planning) bias and the sunk cost fallacy influence Liam's behavior. Justify what decision a strictly rational consumer should make in March when evaluating whether or not to attend a specific session, distinguishing between sunk cost and opportunity cost.
- c) A report concludes: "Gyms base their profitability on exploiting the predictable irrationality of their members". Justify why the company prefers to market Option A and predict what would happen to its revenue and capacity limits if the law required it to refund the proportional part of the fee in months without attendance.
A telecommunications company offers two annual cell phone plans: Basic Plan: $\$18$ per month for $25\ \text{GB}…
A telecommunications company offers two annual cell phone plans:
-
Basic Plan: $\$18$ per month for $25\ \text{GB}$. If the monthly allowance is exhausted, each additional gigabyte costs $\$4$.
-
Unlimited Plan: $\$40$ per month with unlimited data without restrictions.
A customer analyzes her actual usage over the past $12$ months: for $10$ months she consumed an average of $18\ \text{GB}$ per month, and only in $2$ months (summer vacation) did she reach $28\ \text{GB}$ per month. Despite these objective data, she decides to sign up for the Unlimited Plan, stating: "I don't want bill surprises; I'd rather pay a higher fixed fee to have total peace of mind that I'll never be charged an extra fee".
- a) Interpret the customer's usage data and calculate the total annual cost she would have paid with the Basic Plan compared to the Unlimited Plan. Exactly how much is the annual premium she pays for that "peace of mind"?
- b) Justify economically why the customer's choice contradicts the classical model of the rational consumer (homo oeconomicus), analyzing the cognitive biases that explain her decision (such as loss aversion and the overweighting of rare events).
- c) Predict how contracting decisions would change if the telecom company were required by law to send a real-time alert upon reaching $80\,\%$ of the allowance and to allow the one-click purchase of extra $5\ \text{GB}$ packs for $\$5$.
Mateo has a monthly budget of $\$150$ for personal expenses and aims to save $\$50$ each month to buy a computer in a year. However, halfway through the month he usually…
Mateo has a monthly budget of $\$150$ for personal expenses and aims to save $\$50$ each month to buy a computer in a year. However, halfway through the month he usually runs out of funds due to impulse purchases at online stores (flash deals with countdown timers and personalized recommendations with limited-time discounts). At the end of the month he gets frustrated and says: "The problem is that I lack willpower; from now on I will try harder and won't buy anything superfluous".
- a) Explain why Mateo's strategy of "relying on his willpower" is doomed to fail, using the concepts of present bias (hyperbolic discounting) and the time inconsistency of economic decisions.
- b) Design a personal choice architecture plan and commitment devices for Mateo that operate both when receiving his income and at the moment of purchase, eliminating the need to rely on willpower in the heat of the moment.
- c) Justify whether e-commerce companies that create offers with scarcity timers are engaging in fair informational competition or exploiting a cognitive vulnerability of consumers by distorting their valuation of opportunity cost.
Nudges and the line between them and manipulation
In the school cafeteria, fruit is placed at eye level and sweets are placed in a secluded corner, without banning anything. Explain what a 'nudge' is and why this…
In the school cafeteria, fruit is placed at eye level and sweets are placed in a secluded corner, without banning anything. Explain what a 'nudge' is and why this measure is an example of one.
An online store shows "only $2$ left in stock!" and a fifteen-minute countdown to buy. Explain what emotions those messages trigger (fear of missing the opportunity,…
An online store shows "only $2$ left in stock!" and a fifteen-minute countdown to buy. Explain what emotions those messages trigger (fear of missing the opportunity, urgency) and why they push people to buy without comparing.
The supermarket places the more expensive name-brand products at eye level, the store-brand products on the lower shelves, and the candy next to the register. a)…
The supermarket places the more expensive name-brand products at eye level, the store-brand products on the lower shelves, and the candy next to the register.
- a) Identify which "choice architecture" techniques it uses and what biases they exploit.
- b) Propose three specific habits for shopping rationally despite those techniques.
A food delivery app includes a $15$-minute countdown timer on its checkout screen with the message: "Only $2$ couriers left in your area! Add a dessert for $\$3.20…
A food delivery app includes a $15$-minute countdown timer on its checkout screen with the message: "Only $2$ couriers left in your area! Add a dessert for $\$3.20$ (regular price: $\$4.80$) before your booking expires". Additionally, a $10\,\%$ courier tip and a $\$0.50$ charity round-up are pre-selected by default.
- a) Identify the cognitive biases or heuristics exploited by each of these elements (timer, courier notice, strikethrough price, and pre-selected boxes) and explain how they alter the user's perception of opportunity cost.
- b) A platform spokesperson argues: "We don't force anyone; consumers are free to uncheck the boxes or reject offers if they don't maximize their utility". Refute this claim using bounded rationality theory and the concept of dark patterns in choice architecture.
- c) Design a proposed interface modification that preserves useful information for the consumer while ensuring that the additional spending decision results from active deliberation rather than behavioral manipulation.
The federal government wants more young people to save for retirement. One proposal is to automatically enroll them in a savings plan when they start work, with total…
The federal government wants more young people to save for retirement. One proposal is to automatically enroll them in a savings plan when they start work, with total freedom to opt out whenever they want.
- a) Explain which bias automatic enrollment takes advantage of and why it is more effective than an information campaign.
- b) Assess whether it is a legitimate paternalistic measure or an intrusion, defending your position.
A state government wants to increase recycling without banning anything. a) Design a "nudge" intervention: which option would you set as the default, how would you…
A state government wants to increase recycling without banning anything.
- a) Design a "nudge" intervention: which option would you set as the default, how would you arrange the bins or what information would you give, and explain what bias each detail exploits.
- b) Define the ethical limits of the measure: what separates it from manipulation? Mention freedom of choice and transparency.
Back to the start: The sign uses the $\$120$ as a fictitious anchor so that $\$79$ looks like a great opportunity, shaping your perception with a discount that never existed.