Marginal Utility and Consumer Choice
You have $\$10$ at the food truck. The first taco is amazing. The fourth one? Still good, but not like the first. And would you spend your last dollar on a fifth taco or on a drink? Economists have a tidy way to explain how you decide, and it shows up on every AP® Microeconomics exam.
Utility and Diminishing Marginal Utility
Utility is the satisfaction you get from consuming a good. Economists measure it in made-up units called utils. The numbers are not "real"; they just let us compare how much we like things.
Here is Emma's lunch: each slice of pizza adds less than the one before.
| Slices | TU (utils) | MU (utils) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | — |
| 1 | 30 | 30 |
| 2 | 52 | 22 |
| 3 | 66 | 14 |
| 4 | 72 | 6 |
Notice that TU keeps rising, but it rises more slowly each time. That pattern is the law of diminishing marginal utility: as you consume more of a good in a given period, the marginal utility of each additional unit eventually falls.
Why does this happen? The first slice satisfies a very hungry stomach. By the fourth, you are mostly full.
Emma keeps track of her total utility (in "utils") from eating slices of pizza at lunch: 1 slice gives 20 utils, 2 slices give 34 utils, 3 slices give 44 utils, and 4…
Emma keeps track of her total utility (in "utils") from eating slices of pizza at lunch: 1 slice gives 20 utils, 2 slices give 34 utils, 3 slices give 44 utils, and 4 slices give 50 utils. Calculate the marginal utility of each slice. Then state whether her utility pattern shows diminishing marginal utility, and explain how you know.
The Budget Constraint
Wanting more is easy. Paying for it is the problem. A consumer's budget constraint shows every bundle of goods that can be bought with a given income at given prices.
With income $I$, and goods X and Y with prices $P_X$ and $P_Y$:
$$P_X \cdot x + P_Y \cdot y \le I$$A bundle is affordable if its total cost is less than or equal to income. It exhausts the budget if the cost equals income exactly.
The line hits the horizontal axis at $I/P_X = 20/4 = 5$ notebooks and the vertical axis at $I/P_Y = 20/2 = 10$ pens. Its slope is $-P_X/P_Y = -2$: giving up 1 notebook frees up money for 2 pens.
Points on the line spend all the income. Points inside the shaded area are affordable but leave money unspent. Points above the line are unattainable.
Aaliyah has an income of $\$20$ to spend on notebooks, which cost $\$4$ each, and gel pens, which cost $\$2…
Aaliyah has an income of $\$20$ to spend on notebooks, which cost $\$4$ each, and gel pens, which cost $\$2$ each. Is the bundle of 3 notebooks and 4 gel pens affordable? Does it spend her entire budget? Then write the utility-maximizing rule in terms of marginal utilities and prices that she should follow when choosing a bundle.
The Utility-Maximizing Rule
Given a budget, which bundle is best? A fair comparison must account for price. A burrito with MU of 18 utils sounds better than a drink with MU of 6 utils, but the burrito costs three times as much.
So compare marginal utility per dollar: $MU/P$. It tells you how many utils you get from the last dollar spent on that good.
Why? If $MU_X/P_X > MU_Y/P_Y$, a dollar moved from Y to X gains more utils than it loses. So you should keep shifting until the two ratios are equal. When they are equal, no switch can help.
Malik spends his weekly allowance on burritos and drinks. The last burrito gives him 18 utils of marginal utility and costs $\$6…
Malik spends his weekly allowance on burritos and drinks. The last burrito gives him 18 utils of marginal utility and costs $\$6$. The last drink gives him 6 utils of marginal utility and costs $\$2$. Calculate the marginal utility per dollar for each good. Is Malik maximizing his utility? If not, which good should he buy more of?
Marcus spends his money on two kinds of video game rentals, Good A and Good B. At his current bundle, the marginal utility of A is 40 utils and its price is $\$8…
Marcus spends his money on two kinds of video game rentals, Good A and Good B. At his current bundle, the marginal utility of A is 40 utils and its price is $\$8$. The marginal utility of B is 30 utils and its price is $\$5$. (a) Compare the marginal utility per dollar of the two goods. (b) Explain in which direction Marcus should shift his spending. (c) Explain what will happen to the marginal utility of each good as he makes the shift, and why this eventually stops the reallocation.
Finding the Best Bundle from a Table
With a table of marginal utilities, you can build the best bundle one dollar at a time: keep choosing the unit with the highest $MU/P$ until the budget runs out.
Jayden has $\$9$ to spend at a school fundraiser on smoothies (price $\$2$ each) and cookies (price $\$1…
Jayden has $\$9$ to spend at a school fundraiser on smoothies (price $\$2$ each) and cookies (price $\$1$ each). His marginal utility from each unit is shown below.
| Unit | MU of smoothies | MU of cookies |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 20 | 9 |
| 2nd | 16 | 7 |
| 3rd | 12 | 6 |
| 4th | 8 | 4 |
| 5th | 4 | 2 |
(a) Calculate the marginal utility per dollar for each unit of each good. (b) Find the bundle that maximizes Jayden's utility and show that it uses his whole budget. (c) Verify that your bundle satisfies the utility-maximizing rule.
Price Changes and the Law of Demand
The rule also explains why demand curves slope downward. When a price rises, $MU/P$ for that good falls, so the consumer shifts spending to other goods.
Use the same marginal utility table as Jayden's (smoothies: 20, 16, 12, 8, 4 utils for units 1 to 5; cookies: 9, 7, 6, 4, 2 utils for units 1 to 5). Originally, with an…
Use the same marginal utility table as Jayden's (smoothies: 20, 16, 12, 8, 4 utils for units 1 to 5; cookies: 9, 7, 6, 4, 2 utils for units 1 to 5). Originally, with an income of $\$9$, smoothies cost $\$2$ and cookies cost $\$1$, and his best bundle was 3 smoothies and 3 cookies. Now the price of a cookie rises to $\$2$, the price of a smoothie stays at $\$2$, and his income is $\$10$. (a) Find his new utility-maximizing bundle using marginal utility per dollar. (b) Compare the number of cookies he buys now with before, and explain how this result illustrates the law of demand.
Sofia has an income of $\$100$ per month to spend on two goods, X and Y. The price of X is $\$4$ and the price of Y is $\$6…
Sofia has an income of $\$100$ per month to spend on two goods, X and Y. The price of X is $\$4$ and the price of Y is $\$6$. Her marginal utilities depend on how many units she consumes: $MU_X = 80 - 4x$ and $MU_Y = 90 - 3y$, where $x$ and $y$ are the quantities of each good.
(a) Find the quantities of X and Y that maximize her utility. Show that the bundle exhausts her income and that the marginal utility per dollar is equal across goods.
(b) Sofia's friend suggests the bundle $(x, y) = (12, 8)$. Show that it is affordable, and then explain, using marginal utility per dollar, why it is not the best choice for her.
(c) Explain why the optimum has to satisfy both the budget constraint and the equal-ratio condition, and what would happen to her utility if she satisfied only one of them.
Camila is at her utility-maximizing bundle of concert tickets (good X) and streaming credits (good Y). At that bundle, $MU_X = 20$ utils with $P_X = \$5$, and $MU_Y =…
Camila is at her utility-maximizing bundle of concert tickets (good X) and streaming credits (good Y). At that bundle, $MU_X = 20$ utils with $P_X = \$5$, and $MU_Y = 12$ utils with $PY = \$3$. The price of a concert ticket then falls to $\$4$, while her income and $PY$ stay the same.
(a) Show that she was at an optimum before the price change.
(b) After the price falls, compare the marginal utility per dollar of the two goods at her old bundle. Which good should she buy more of, and why?
(c) Suppose that, as she buys more concert tickets, the marginal utility of tickets falls, while $MU_Y$ stays at 12 for the purpose of this problem. At what value of $MU_X$ does she stop adding tickets? Explain how diminishing marginal utility connects this result to the downward-sloping demand curve.
Back to the food truck: you stop buying tacos when the last dollar on tacos gives no more satisfaction than the last dollar on a drink.