Preparing for the Economics research study
Would a rent cap lower rents in Dublin? You have probably heard people argue about it, usually loudly and without numbers. A research study works differently. It asks a question that can be tested, collects evidence, and says only what that evidence supports. This page takes you through those steps one by one, so that you can show you can do what an economist does.
What the research study is, and what you must check
The extract of the specification used to write this page shows only these section headings. It does not show the text underneath. So this page does not tell you the task wording, the timeline, what you hand in, the word limit, whether you work alone, or the official assessment criteria. Those details come from the Research study section of the specification and from the current SEC/NCCA guidelines for your year. Check the current guidelines with your teacher and the SEC.
What this page can do is train the skills any economics research study needs. The practice rubric on this page is a self-check tool made for practice. It is not the SEC marking scheme.
Before you start your research study, you need to know what is confirmed and what you still have to check. Here is what you have been given: The extract of the Economics…
Before you start your research study, you need to know what is confirmed and what you still have to check. Here is what you have been given:
-
The extract of the Economics Curriculum Specification used for this unit shows, in its contents page, a section called Research study and a section called Assessment criteria for the research study. The text of those sections was not in the extract.
-
Your course outline lists the research study as the second assessment component, worth 20%.
Sort each statement below into one of three groups: Confirmed (from the information above), Must check (you need your teacher, the specification or the current SEC guidelines), or False.
- a) The specification has a section headed "Research study".
- b) The specification has a section called "Assessment criteria for the research study".
- c) Your course outline lists the research study as the second assessment component, worth 20%.
- d) The maximum word count of the report.
- e) The date by which the report must be submitted.
- f) Whether you work alone or in a group.
- g) The exact wording of the official assessment criteria.
- h) The practice rubric in this unit is the official SEC marking scheme.
Then write three questions you will ask your teacher in the first week, and say where you will look for the answers (for example, the specification, the SEC/NCCA guidelines for the current year, or your teacher).
A researchable question and a testable hypothesis
A good research question is specific, measurable and answerable with data you can actually get. It names a place and a time period and uses an economic concept from your course.
The three research questions below are too weak to investigate. For each one, (i) say in one sentence why it is weak, and (ii) rewrite it as a specific question that…
The three research questions below are too weak to investigate. For each one, (i) say in one sentence why it is weak, and (ii) rewrite it as a specific question that includes a place, a time period and something measurable. Then name one Irish source of data you could use.
- a) "Is Ireland rich?"
- b) "Are rents bad?"
- c) "Why is everything so dear?"
Choose one of these topic areas: 1. The cost of a weekly grocery basket in your county 2. The minimum wage and teenage jobs in hospitality 3. Fuel prices and the choice…
Choose one of these topic areas:
-
The cost of a weekly grocery basket in your county
-
The minimum wage and teenage jobs in hospitality
-
Fuel prices and the choice between driving and public transport in Kerry
-
Tourism demand and hotel prices in Killarney
- a) Write a research question for your topic. It must include a place, a time period and a measurable item.
- b) Write a hypothesis that predicts a direction (increase, decrease, or difference between two groups).
- c) Name the economic concept from your course that the study relies on (for example, price elasticity, opportunity cost or inflation), and explain in two sentences why it fits.
- d) State what data you would need and name a realistic source for it.
- e) Self-check your work. Answer yes or no to each item, and rewrite any part where you answered no:
-
Can the question be answered with data you can actually get?
-
Is there a place and a time period?
-
Is the hypothesis testable, meaning it could turn out to be wrong?
-
Is an economic concept clearly linked to the question?
-
Is the question narrow enough for one student to investigate?
Variables, assumptions and sources
Economics rarely allows a controlled experiment, so you manage variables in another way.
Not every source is equally reliable. Ask five things about any source:
-
Who produced it?
-
How was it measured?
-
When was it published?
-
How much does it cover (sample or population)?
-
Could there be bias, for example a reason to push a particular view?
An official statistics release with a methodology note is usually more reliable than an anonymous blog or a social media poll. Even a good source has limits: advertised rents are not the same as rents actually paid.
Niamh, a Leaving Certificate student in Athlone, wants to find out whether the price of a cinema ticket affects the number of tickets sold. She collects these figures…
Niamh, a Leaving Certificate student in Athlone, wants to find out whether the price of a cinema ticket affects the number of tickets sold. She collects these figures from a local cinema (invented figures for practice):
| Ticket price (€) | Average weekly attendance |
|---|---|
| 8 | 520 |
| 9 | 480 |
| 10 | 430 |
| 11 | 410 |
- a) Identify the independent variable and the dependent variable, and give the unit of each.
- b) Name two other factors that could also change attendance. Say whether Niamh should hold each one constant or just acknowledge it as a limitation.
- c) Calculate the percentage change in price and the percentage change in attendance when the price rises from €8 to €11. Give your answers to 1 decimal place.
- d) Write a hypothesis for Niamh with a clear direction. Say which economic idea it is based on.
You are researching the question: "How have rents in Dublin changed since 2019?" You find four sources: | Source | Description | |---|---| | A | A CSO statistical…
You are researching the question: "How have rents in Dublin changed since 2019?" You find four sources:
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
| A | A CSO statistical release on rents, published quarterly, with a methodology note explaining how rents are measured |
| B | An anonymous blog post from 2021 called "Why you'll never afford a home", citing no figures |
| C | A quarterly report from a property website, based on rents advertised on its own site |
| D | An Instagram poll of 120 followers of an influencer asking "Is your rent too high?" |
- a) For each source, rate its reliability as High, Medium or Low. Judge it on author or organisation, method, date, coverage and possible bias, and give one reason for each rating.
- b) Choose the two sources you would use. Explain your choice.
- c) Source C is based on advertised rents, not on rents actually paid. Explain why this matters for your conclusions.
- d) Write a source note of about 40 words for one of your chosen sources. It should say who produced it, what it measures, and one limitation.
Planning safely and ethically
A plan says what you will do, in what order, and by when. If you collect data from people, you also have to protect them.
A fifth-year student in a Sligo school wants to find out how much fifth-year students spend each week on food and drink outside school, and whether students with…
A fifth-year student in a Sligo school wants to find out how much fifth-year students spend each week on food and drink outside school, and whether students with part-time jobs spend more. The school has 160 fifth-year students. She plans a questionnaire for 50 of them.
- a) List four ethical or safety precautions she should take before and during the survey (for example, about permission, privacy and sensitive questions).
- b) Suggest how she could choose 50 students so that the sample is not biased. Explain why asking only her friends would be a problem.
- c) These three draft questions are flawed. Say what is wrong with each and rewrite it:
-
Q1: "Do you agree that students waste far too much money on coffee?"
-
Q2: "How much do you earn at your Tesco job, and what is your PPS number?"
-
Q3: "How much do you spend?"
- d) Draft a simple four-week timeline: planning, collecting data, analysing, writing up.
- e) Self-assess your plan using this practice rubric. It is a practice tool and not the official SEC criteria. Give yourself 1, 2 or 3 for each criterion and justify each score in one sentence.
| Criterion | 1 (Developing) | 2 (Secure) | 3 (Strong) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethics and safety | One precaution, vague | Two or three clear precautions | Four or more precautions, each with a reason |
| Sampling | No method stated | A method, but bias not discussed | A method and bias addressed |
| Question wording | Questions leading or unclear | Mostly clear and neutral | All clear, neutral and measurable |
| Timeline | No timeline | Steps listed with no dates | Realistic steps with dates and a buffer |
Organising and analysing data
Raw numbers do not answer a question until you organise them. Put them in a clear table, with units and a source, and then calculate something that lets you compare.
Percentage change and index numbers are better than euro change for comparing things that start from different levels. Rounding is fine, but state how many decimal places you use and keep to it.
A student investigates the hypothesis: "Average monthly rents in Dublin rose faster than in Cork between 2019 and 2023." She collects these figures (invented for…
A student investigates the hypothesis: "Average monthly rents in Dublin rose faster than in Cork between 2019 and 2023." She collects these figures (invented for practice, in euro per month):
| Year | Dublin (€) | Cork (€) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 950 | 1 320 |
| 2020 | 1 940 | 1 300 |
| 2021 | 1 990 | 1 400 |
| 2022 | 2 160 | 1 520 |
| 2023 | 2 330 | 1 650 |
- a) Calculate the change in euro and the percentage change from 2019 to 2023 for each city. Give percentages to 1 decimal place.
- b) Calculate an index number for 2022 and 2023 for each city, with 2019 = 100. Give your answers to 1 decimal place.
- c) Is the hypothesis supported? Explain the difference between the answer using euro change and the answer using percentage change, and say which is better for comparing growth between two cities with different starting levels.
- d) Write a findings paragraph of 80–100 words that includes at least two numbers and does not claim to know the cause of the rent increases.
- e) Give two limitations of using these figures to test the hypothesis.
Conclusions, limitations and writing it up
A conclusion answers your research question using your evidence and goes no further. A limitation is a reason the evidence might be weaker than it looks.
Common limitations are a small or unrepresentative sample, one place or one period, self-reported data, other factors you could not control, and the source itself (for example, advertised rather than actual prices).
A student in a Limerick school tests the hypothesis: "Part-time work increases a student's weekly spending." She surveys 60 Transition Year and fifth-year students. Of…
A student in a Limerick school tests the hypothesis: "Part-time work increases a student's weekly spending." She surveys 60 Transition Year and fifth-year students. Of these, 38 have a part-time job and 22 do not. The average weekly spending is €45 for students with a job and €28 for those without. All answers were self-reported on paper forms, and all 60 students come from one school.
- a) Calculate the difference in average weekly spending. Then calculate how much higher, as a percentage, spending is for working students compared with non-working students (to 1 decimal place).
- b) Does this result prove that part-time work causes higher spending? Explain.
- c) Identify four limitations of the study, referring to the information above (for example, sample, how data was collected, other variables, size).
- d) Write a "Limitations and evaluation" paragraph of about 120–150 words. This is a practice target, not an official limit. It should:
-
state the result with numbers,
-
explain at least three limitations,
-
suggest one specific improvement for a future study.
Self-assessing with a rubric
Self-assessment means checking your work against clear criteria before anyone else does. The rubric below is a practice tool and not the SEC marking scheme. For the official criteria, use the Research study assessment criteria in the specification and the current guidelines.
| Criterion | 1 (Developing) | 2 (Secure) | 3 (Strong) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question and hypothesis | Vague, not testable | Clear but no direction or measure | Specific, measurable and directional |
| Evidence and numbers | Few or no numbers | Numbers given but not analysed | Numbers analysed with a source named |
| Conclusion matches evidence | Claims far beyond the data | Mostly supported | Cautious, supported, linked to the hypothesis |
| Limitations | None | One, briefly | Several, explained with their effect |
Score yourself on each row by pointing to a specific phrase or number in your work. Then pick the lowest row and set one improvement target.
Read this draft extract from a student's study on bus use: > Hypothesis: Cheaper fares are good. > > Method: I looked at Leap Card journeys in my town for three months…
Read this draft extract from a student's study on bus use:
Hypothesis: Cheaper fares are good.
Method: I looked at Leap Card journeys in my town for three months after the fare discount and found they went up from 4 200 to 4 900 per week.
Conclusion: This proves the fare discount caused a big increase in passengers, so the Government should cut all fares.
- a) Calculate the percentage increase in weekly journeys (to 1 decimal place).
- b) Score the draft using this practice rubric (not the official SEC criteria). Give 1, 2 or 3 for each criterion and justify each score by quoting or referring to the draft.
| Criterion | 1 (Developing) | 2 (Secure) | 3 (Strong) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question and hypothesis | Vague, not testable | Clear but no direction or measure | Specific, measurable and directional |
| Evidence and numbers | Few or no numbers | Numbers given but not analysed | Numbers analysed (for example, percentages) with a source |
| Conclusion matches evidence | Claims go far beyond the data | Mostly supported, some overclaiming | Cautious, supported and linked to the hypothesis |
| Limitations | None mentioned | One mentioned briefly | Several explained with their effect on the conclusion |
- c) Give the draft a total out of 12.
- d) Rewrite the hypothesis and the conclusion so that each would score 3 on its criterion. Use your answer to (a).
- e) Set one improvement target for the next draft.
In summary
Back to the start: a rent-cap debate becomes research when you turn it into a specific question, test it with reliable evidence, and say only what that evidence shows.