Classical atomic models
The Bohr model was born from a very specific problem: classical physics predicted that no atom could be stable, and yet the iron in a bridge or a chair does not disintegrate. Understanding how, in little more than a century, we got from Dalton's solid sphere to Bohr's energy levels is understanding how physics really advances: not through intuition, but driven by experiments that knocked down each earlier model in turn.
Dalton, Thomson and Rutherford: three models in less than a century
When you rub a plastic ruler on your jumper, it attracts tiny bits of paper, showing that neutral matter hides electric charges that can be separated. What must the atom be like inside to be electrically neutral at rest and yet contain charged particles?
Cathode rays and the electron
A beam is deflected by an electric field only if it carries charge. A beam of light or an uncharged particle feels no force from the field, so it goes straight on. A beam bent towards the positive plate must be negatively charged, and the size of the deflection depends on the charge-to-mass ratio. Thomson found the same charge-to-mass ratio whatever gas was in the tube, so the electron is a particle common to all atoms.
Cathode rays are beams of particles that travel from the negative electrode (cathode) to the positive one in a nearly empty tube. Old cathode-ray televisions used this principle. They are not light: they are deflected by electric fields, and a beam of light would not be. Thomson placed charged plates either side of the tube and the beam bent towards the positive plate, so the particles are negatively charged. With different gases he always got the same charge-to-mass ratio, so electrons are a constituent of all atoms. This disproves Dalton's idea that atoms are indivisible, and because atoms are neutral, Thomson had to add an equal amount of positive charge spread through the atom.
When John Dalton proposed his atomic model in $1808$, he imagined atoms as tiny solid spheres. Explain in your own words the two main ideas of his model: what an atom is…
When John Dalton proposed his atomic model in $1808$, he imagined atoms as tiny solid spheres. Explain in your own words the two main ideas of his model: what an atom is according to Dalton and how atoms of one element differ from those of a different element.
In $1897$, J. J. Thomson experimented with cathode ray tubes, which are nearly empty glass tubes with two electrodes connected to a very high voltage. A diagram of one…
In $1897$, J. J. Thomson experimented with cathode ray tubes, which are nearly empty glass tubes with two electrodes connected to a very high voltage. A diagram of one of these tubes is shown in the figure.
What particle did Thomson discover through these experiments? What electric charge does this particle have, and where did it come from, according to his interpretation?
In $1911$, Rutherford and his collaborators bombarded an extremely thin sheet of gold foil with $\alpha$ particles, which have a positive charge. What happened to the…
In $1911$, Rutherford and his collaborators bombarded an extremely thin sheet of gold foil with $\alpha$ particles, which have a positive charge. What happened to the vast majority of the particles when they reached the foil? What conclusion did Rutherford draw about the inside of the atom?
Old cathode-ray tube televisions worked using a gun that fired a beam of electrons against the screen. a) What are cathode rays? b) What experimental observation proves…
Old cathode-ray tube televisions worked using a gun that fired a beam of electrons against the screen.
- a) What are cathode rays?
- b) What experimental observation proves that they are composed of charged particles rather than a form of light?
In the gold foil experiment, three things were observed: most of the $\alpha$ particles passed through the foil without deflecting, a small fraction deflected at large…
In the gold foil experiment, three things were observed: most of the $\alpha$ particles passed through the foil without deflecting, a small fraction deflected at large angles, and a very few bounced straight back. The figure summarizes these three observations.
- a) Write down the conclusion Rutherford drew from each of the three observations.
- b) What would Thomson's model have predicted for this experiment? Why was this prediction not fulfilled?
The electron discovered by Thomson is a particle that comes from inside atoms, regardless of the element. a) Explain what fundamental idea of Dalton's model was…
The electron discovered by Thomson is a particle that comes from inside atoms, regardless of the element.
- a) Explain what fundamental idea of Dalton's model was disproved by this discovery.
- b) If atoms contain electrons, which are negatively charged, but are electrically neutral, what did Thomson have to add to his model to explain this neutrality?
Thomson placed two electrically charged plates on either side of the cathode ray tube and observed that the beam deflected towards the positive plate. The set-up is…
Thomson placed two electrically charged plates on either side of the cathode ray tube and observed that the beam deflected towards the positive plate. The set-up is shown in the figure.
- a) What did Thomson conclude about the sign of the charge of the particles in the beam? Explain your reasoning.
- b) He repeated the experiment with tubes containing different gases and always obtained the same particles, with the same charge-to-mass ratio. What does this result imply about the electron as a constituent of matter?
The diameter of an atom is of the order of $10^{-10}\ \text{m}$ and that of its nucleus is of the order of $10^{-15}\ \text{m}$. a) Calculate how many times larger the…
The diameter of an atom is of the order of $10^{-10}\ \text{m}$ and that of its nucleus is of the order of $10^{-15}\ \text{m}$.
- a) Calculate how many times larger the diameter of the atom is than that of the nucleus.
- b) If the nucleus were the size of a marble with a diameter of $1\ \text{cm}$, what diameter would the atom have at that scale? Express the result in kilometres.
In the gold foil experiment, for every $20000$ $\alpha$ particles fired, about $19980$ passed through the foil without deflecting, $19$ deflected at large angles and $1$…
In the gold foil experiment, for every $20000$ $\alpha$ particles fired, about $19980$ passed through the foil without deflecting, $19$ deflected at large angles and $1$ bounced straight back.
- a) Calculate what percentage of the particles passed through the foil without deflecting.
- b) Calculate what percentage bounced back.
- c) Interpret these two percentages: what do they say about the size of the nucleus compared to that of the atom?
Dalton's model was not just a whim: it explained the chemical laws of his time. a) Explain how the idea that atoms are neither created nor destroyed, but only…
Dalton's model was not just a whim: it explained the chemical laws of his time.
- a) Explain how the idea that atoms are neither created nor destroyed, but only rearranged, justifies the law of conservation of mass in a chemical reaction.
- b) How does Dalton's model explain why a compound like water always contains hydrogen and oxygen in the same ratio?
$\alpha$ particles have a positive charge and a mass about $7000$ times greater than that of the electron. a) Explain, using forces between electric charges, why an…
$\alpha$ particles have a positive charge and a mass about $7000$ times greater than that of the electron.
- a) Explain, using forces between electric charges, why an $\alpha$ particle passing very close to the nucleus deflects significantly, but barely changes its trajectory when passing near an electron.
- b) Why do the particles that get closest to the nucleus bounce straight back?
- c) If the gold foil were twice as thick, how would you expect the proportion of particles bouncing back to change? Explain your answer.
Imagine that Thomson's model were correct and the atom were a soft sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it. a) What would happen to $\alpha$ particles as…
Imagine that Thomson's model were correct and the atom were a soft sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it.
- a) What would happen to $\alpha$ particles as they passed through the gold foil according to that model? Could they ever bounce back? Explain your reasoning thinking about how charge and mass are distributed.
- b) What observation from the actual experiment proves that model to be false?
- c) Explain why, for an $\alpha$ particle to be able to bounce back, the positive charge and almost all the mass must be concentrated in a very small space.
The stability problem of Rutherford's atom
Rutherford's planetary model had electrons orbiting freely around the nucleus, like planets around the Sun. But according to classical electromagnetism, already well established by 1911, any accelerated electric charge (and an electron moving in a circle is constantly changing direction, so it is accelerating) emits electromagnetic radiation and, with it, loses energy.
According to classical physics, an electron orbiting the nucleus should continuously lose energy by emitting light and end up spiralling into the nucleus in a fraction…
According to classical physics, an electron orbiting the nucleus should continuously lose energy by emitting light and end up spiralling into the nucleus in a fraction of a second: Rutherford's model rendered atoms unstable.
- a) What did Bohr postulate about "stationary orbits" to prevent this catastrophe?
- b) What does it mean that Bohr introduced a "postulate" instead of deducing it from known laws? What justifies accepting a new postulate in science?
- c) What experimental fact, inexplicable by Rutherford's model, was indeed explained by Bohr's model thanks to its energy levels?
Bohr: allowed energy levels
Every model has assumptions and limitations. Here are those of the two models you have met so far.
-
Nuclear (Rutherford) model. Assumptions: a tiny, dense, positive nucleus with electrons orbiting it. Limitation: it cannot explain why atoms are stable, nor why elements emit line spectra.
-
Bohr model. Assumptions: electrons move on fixed circular orbits with quantised energies and do not radiate in them. Limitations: it works well only for hydrogen (one electron), it cannot explain the relative intensity of spectral lines, and it does not explain bonding.
In 1913, Niels Bohr resolved the contradiction with an idea that was not deduced from any earlier law, but was imposed as a postulate: accepting a new rule because its consequences agree with experiment, even though it is not yet known how to derive it from deeper principles.
In $1913$, Niels Bohr applied the new quantum ideas to the hydrogen atom. Explain what Bohr postulated about electron orbits and what happens, according to his model,…
In $1913$, Niels Bohr applied the new quantum ideas to the hydrogen atom. Explain what Bohr postulated about electron orbits and what happens, according to his model, when an electron jumps from a permitted orbit to a lower one.
Atomic spectra: the decisive experimental evidence
When you sprinkle common salt on the flame of a gas cooker, it turns a bright yellow, while copper salts produce a brilliant blue-green, like the colours in a New Year's Eve fireworks display over Dublin. Why do elements not give off continuous white light like the Sun when heated, but such specific, pure colours?
Fireworks owe their colours to the salts they contain: strontium produces red light, sodium yellow, and copper blue-green. When heated, each element emits light of…
Fireworks owe their colours to the salts they contain: strontium produces red light, sodium yellow, and copper blue-green. When heated, each element emits light of characteristic colours that form its emission spectrum. Explain what an element's spectrum is and why it is said to be like its fingerprint.
In $1868$, while studying the spectrum of sunlight during an eclipse, a yellow line was observed that did not correspond to any element known on Earth. It was proposed…
In $1868$, while studying the spectrum of sunlight during an eclipse, a yellow line was observed that did not correspond to any element known on Earth. It was proposed that it belonged to a new element, named helium, from the Greek helios, "Sun".
- a) Explain how it is possible to know the chemical composition of a star without bringing back samples from it.
- b) How does this discovery relate to the idea that each element possesses a characteristic spectrum?
The Balmer series of hydrogen satisfies the formula $\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_{\text{H}}\times\left(\frac{1}{2^2} - \frac{1}{n^2}\right)$, with…
The Balmer series of hydrogen satisfies the formula
$\frac{1}{\lambda} = R_{\text{H}}\times\left(\frac{1}{2^2} - \frac{1}{n^2}\right)$, with $R_{\text{H}} = 1.097\times10^{7}\ \text{m}^{-1}$ and $n = 3, 4, 5\dots$
- a) Calculate the wavelength $\lambda$ for $n = 3$ and express it in $\text{nm}$. What colour of the visible spectrum does it approximately correspond to?
- b) Repeat the calculation for $n = 4$.
- c) What happens to the wavelengths as $n$ increases? Calculate the limiting value for $n \rightarrow \infty$ and explain why the lines in the series get closer and closer together.
The visible spectrum of hydrogen shows lines at $656\ \text{nm}$ and $486\ \text{nm}$; that of helium, at $588\ \text{nm}$ and $447\ \text{nm}$. The light from a…
The visible spectrum of hydrogen shows lines at $656\ \text{nm}$ and $486\ \text{nm}$; that of helium, at $588\ \text{nm}$ and $447\ \text{nm}$. The light from a discharge tube containing an unknown gas is analysed and lines appear at $656\ \text{nm}$, $486\ \text{nm}$, $588\ \text{nm}$ and $447\ \text{nm}$. The figure shows the observed spectrum.
- a) Which gas or gases does the tube contain? Justify your answer.
- b) Would observing a single line, for example $588\ \text{nm}$, be enough to state with certainty that helium is present? Explain what role the full set of lines plays in identification.
- c) This method made it possible to discover helium in the Sun before finding it on Earth: explain why spectral analysis is such a powerful tool in astronomy.
The limits of the Bohr model and the missing neutron
The Bohr model explained the spectrum of hydrogen wonderfully, with a single electron. But when it was applied to atoms with more electrons, which repel one another as well as being attracted by the nucleus, its predictions stopped fitting with the same precision.
The three particles you need to know are summarised below (masses relative to the proton).
| Particle | Relative mass | Charge | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proton | 1 | +1 | nucleus |
| Neutron | 1 | 0 | nucleus |
| Electron | about 1/1836 | −1 | outside the nucleus |
Bohr's fixed orbits were later replaced by the orbital model, in which electrons are found in regions of space (orbitals) where they are most likely to be: you will meet it in the next section.
In addition, until 1932 the nuclear model had a separate problem, one of mass: most nuclei (all except hydrogen-1) weighed at least about twice as much as the protons alone could account for (the number of protons, $Z$, was already known from the charge of the nucleus). James Chadwick solved the puzzle by bombarding beryllium with $\alpha$ particles: he obtained a very penetrating radiation with no electric charge (it was not deflected by electric fields), capable of knocking protons out of a sheet of paraffin wax. He had discovered the neutron, the uncharged particle which, together with the proton, completes the nucleus and explains the excess mass.
On a timeline in the physics classroom, the following milestones appear out of order: Rutherford's model ($1911$), Dalton's model ($1808$), Bohr's model ($1913$) and…
On a timeline in the physics classroom, the following milestones appear out of order: Rutherford's model ($1911$), Dalton's model ($1808$), Bohr's model ($1913$) and Thomson's model ($1897$). Order the four models from oldest to most recent and write the popular name by which Thomson's model is known.
A popular science magazine publishes four quotes without mentioning who wrote them. Attribute each one to Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford or Bohr: a) "The atom is a solid,…
A popular science magazine publishes four quotes without mentioning who wrote them. Attribute each one to Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford or Bohr:
- a) "The atom is a solid, indivisible sphere."
- b) "The atom is a sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it."
- c) "The positive charge and almost all the mass are concentrated in a tiny nucleus."
- d) "Electrons can only occupy certain orbits, with well-defined energies."
In $1932$, Chadwick bombarded beryllium with $\alpha$ particles and obtained highly penetrating radiation that was not deflected by electric fields and was capable of…
In $1932$, Chadwick bombarded beryllium with $\alpha$ particles and obtained highly penetrating radiation that was not deflected by electric fields and was capable of knocking protons out of a paraffin block: he had discovered the neutron. The experimental set-up is shown in the figure.
- a) Why is uncharged radiation not deflected by electric fields?
- b) Explain why the neutron was much harder to detect than the electron or the $\alpha$ particle.
- c) Known nuclei weighed more than twice as much as they would if they only contained protons: explain how the discovery of the neutron resolved this problem with the nuclear model.
Write a short popular science article entitled "From Billiards to the Quantum Leap: A Century of Atomic Models". a) For each model (Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford and…
Write a short popular science article entitled "From Billiards to the Quantum Leap: A Century of Atomic Models".
- a) For each model (Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford and Bohr), summarise its image of the atom and the experiment or observation that motivated it.
- b) Indicate what each model retained from the previous one and what it had to change.
- c) Conclude by explaining the role that experiments play in the evolution of scientific models.
Back to the beginning: Bohr's stationary levels give a first explanation of why atoms, and so the iron in a bridge or a chair, do not collapse in barely $10^{-11}\ \text{s}$ as classical physics predicted, though the full explanation needs the quantum model.