Consumer Spending Patterns in Ireland
Two households in the same town open their bank statements. One spends almost half of its weekly income on rent and food. The other spends a much smaller fraction on those, and a lot more on holidays and eating out. Why do richer households not simply buy more of everything in the same proportions? And why should a supermarket, or the Minister for Finance, care? By the end of this page you will be able to answer both questions with numbers.
The CSO Household Budget Survey
Where do the real figures come from? The Central Statistics Office (CSO) runs the Household Budget Survey (HBS). Thousands of households across Ireland record their spending over a period, and the CSO also collects their income, size and location. The survey measures how households spend their money: average weekly spending on food, housing, transport, recreation and so on, broken down by income group, household type and region.
Results are used by many people:
-
The CSO uses the spending shares to set the weights of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). A price rise on something that takes a large share of budgets counts for more.
-
The government uses the data when designing the Budget, for example to judge who would be hit hardest by a rise in VAT or excise duty, or how well social welfare payments cover the cost of living.
-
Businesses use it to see which markets are growing as incomes rise, and where to locate or what to stock.
The Central Statistics Office (CSO) conducts a Household Budget Survey. Explain what the survey measures and give two uses of its results for government or business.
The Central Statistics Office (CSO) conducts a Household Budget Survey. Explain what the survey measures and give two uses of its results for government or business.
Income elasticity and types of good
When income changes, spending on different goods changes by different amounts. Income elasticity of demand (YED) measures this response.
The sign and size of YED classify the good:
| YED | Type of good | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| $YED < 0$ | Inferior good | Demand falls as income rises (own-brand bread, bus travel for some) |
| $0 < YED < 1$ | Normal good, necessity | Demand rises, but less than proportionally (milk, electricity) |
| $YED > 1$ | Normal good, luxury | Demand rises more than proportionally (foreign holidays, eating out) |
Note the link to shares. A necessity has $YED < 1$, so its share of the budget falls as income rises. A luxury has $YED > 1$, so its share rises. This pattern for food is known as Engel's law: the share of income spent on food falls as income rises.
Explain the difference between a necessity good and a luxury good, using income elasticity of demand. Give one example of each that Irish households buy.
Explain the difference between a necessity good and a luxury good, using income elasticity of demand. Give one example of each that Irish households buy.
A household's weekly income rises from €800 to €880. Its weekly spending on eating out rises from €40 to €52. a) Calculate the percentage change in income and in…
A household's weekly income rises from €800 to €880. Its weekly spending on eating out rises from €40 to €52.
- a) Calculate the percentage change in income and in spending.
- b) Calculate the income elasticity of demand for eating out.
- c) Classify the good (inferior, normal necessity or luxury) and justify.
A household's spending on own-brand bread falls from €12 to €9 per week when income rises by 10%. a) Calculate the percentage fall in spending and the income elasticity.…
A household's spending on own-brand bread falls from €12 to €9 per week when income rises by 10%.
- a) Calculate the percentage fall in spending and the income elasticity.
- b) Identify the type of good and explain.
- c) Explain what this means for a supermarket planning its range during a period of rising incomes.
Comparing households: shares and Engel's law
Survey tables usually compare income groups. The method has two stages: first find shares, then see how the shares change with income.
Businesses read these tables as a forecast. If incomes in an area are rising, firms selling goods with a high YED (holidays, premium products) can expect their share of consumer spending to grow. Firms selling inferior goods should expect a squeeze, and may need to move upmarket.
The table shows the weekly spending of two Irish households on selected items. | Item | Low-income household (€) | High-income household (€) | |---|---|---| | Food | 90…
The table shows the weekly spending of two Irish households on selected items.
| Item | Low-income household (€) | High-income household (€) |
|---|---|---|
| Food | 90 | 150 |
| Housing | 120 | 300 |
| Recreation | 20 | 120 |
| Total spending | 400 | 1,000 |
- a) Calculate the percentage of total spending going to each item for each household.
- b) Explain what the pattern shows about necessities and luxuries.
- c) State what you can conclude about how the share of food in spending changes as income rises (Engel's law).
Using the data: business and policy
Elasticity and planning
Take a household survey with three income groups. To find YED for an item between two groups, use the percentage change method: compare spending and income of group B with group A (the starting point), exactly as in the formula.
For business, the implication is straightforward: expect luxuries to grow faster than the economy during an upswing and to fall faster in a recession, while necessities are steadier and inferior goods move against the cycle. A retailer needs a product mix that matches the phase of the cycle.
Price elasticity and revenue
When a firm also knows PED, it can predict revenue. If demand is inelastic ($|PED| < 1$), a price rise increases total revenue ($TR = P \times Q$), because the percentage fall in quantity is smaller than the percentage rise in price. Take $PED = -0.6$: a 10% price rise reduces quantity by about 6%, so revenue rises by roughly 3.4%. If $|PED| > 1$, a price rise would reduce revenue.
When price and income both change, add the two effects on quantity: $\%\ \Delta Q \approx PED \times \%\ \Delta P + YED \times \%\ \Delta Y$. Each elasticity measures its own effect, holding the other variable constant.
Limitations of survey data
Here is an illustrative pattern of the kind the CSO Household Budget Survey reports, as shares of weekly spending by income group. The figures are rounded and for illustration only: check the latest CSO release for exact values.
| Item | Lower-income households | Middle-income households | Higher-income households |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing, fuel and power | 32% | 25% | 20% |
| Food and non-alcoholic drinks | 18% | 14% | 11% |
| Transport | 9% | 14% | 16% |
| Restaurants and hotels | 3% | 6% | 9% |
Lower-income households spend a noticeably larger share on housing and food, and higher-income households spend more on transport, recreation and eating out. This is the pattern YED predicts: necessities take a falling share as income rises and luxuries a rising share.
Survey data have limits. A cross-section survey compares different households at one time. Using it to predict how one household will behave as its income rises assumes that a poorer household would behave like a richer one if it became richer. In reality, tastes, age, household size and location differ between groups. Prices and expectations also change over time. Surveys rely on households recording their spending accurately, they are based on a sample, and the data may be out of date by the time they are published. Predictions should therefore be treated as estimates.
When rent takes a bigger share
Rents in Irish cities have risen faster than incomes since 2010. Housing is a necessity with price-inelastic demand (households cannot easily cut back on where they live), so when rents rise faster than incomes it takes a growing share of a budget. Take a student household with a monthly income of €2,400 and rent of €1,000: the share is $\frac{1000}{2400} \approx 41.7\%$. If rent rises 15% to €1,150 and income rises 3% to €2,472, the share is $\frac{1150}{2472} \approx 46.5\%$. That leaves less for other goods and for saving. Lower spending on other items reduces aggregate demand, and lower saving reduces funds available for investment (saving is a leakage, but also the source of credit).
Policy responses include rent controls (such as Rent Pressure Zones), which limit increases but may reduce the supply of rental homes, and housing supplements (such as HAP), which raise tenants' ability to pay but may push rents up if supply is limited. Increasing the supply of homes helps in the long run but takes time and costs money. In discussion, always state the benefit, the side effect and who gains or loses.
The following data come from a household survey in an Irish town: | Income group | Average weekly income (€) | Food (€) | Housing (€) | Holidays (€) |…
The following data come from a household survey in an Irish town:
| Income group | Average weekly income (€) | Food (€) | Housing (€) | Holidays (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 400 | 100 | 140 | 10 |
| B | 800 | 160 | 260 | 60 |
| C | 1,600 | 220 | 480 | 260 |
- a) Calculate the spending shares of each item for each group.
- b) Calculate the income elasticity of demand for each item between groups A and B (use the percentage change method).
- c) Classify each good and explain the implications for business planning as incomes grow.
- d) Discuss the limitations of using cross-section survey data to predict how an individual household will behave over time.
Since 2010 rents in Irish cities have risen faster than incomes. A student household has a monthly income of €2,400 and spends €1,000 on rent. a) Calculate the share of…
Since 2010 rents in Irish cities have risen faster than incomes. A student household has a monthly income of €2,400 and spends €1,000 on rent.
- a) Calculate the share of income spent on rent.
- b) Rent rises by 15% while income rises by 3%. Calculate the new share of income spent on rent.
- c) Explain the effect on spending on other goods and on saving, and the likely effect on aggregate demand.
- d) Discuss two policy responses and their possible side effects on the housing market.
A retailer in Cork sells a premium product with an income elasticity of 1.8 and an own-price elasticity of -0.6, and a budget product with an income elasticity of -0.5.…
A retailer in Cork sells a premium product with an income elasticity of 1.8 and an own-price elasticity of -0.6, and a budget product with an income elasticity of -0.5.
- a) Predict the effect on quantity demanded of each product if incomes rise by 5%.
- b) Predict the effect on revenue of the premium product if its price rises by 10% and incomes are constant.
- c) Explain what happens to the retailer's product mix in a recession.
- d) Recommend a pricing and stocking strategy for the next two years and justify it.
Back to the start
Why did the two households spend so differently? Because food and housing are necessities (YED below 1), their shares fall as income rises, while holidays and eating out are luxuries (YED above 1), so their shares rise. Supermarkets and governments care because those shares predict how spending, prices and tax revenue will move as incomes grow or fall.
Summary
-
A spending share is $\frac{\text{item}}{\text{income (or total spending)}} \times 100$. Always check which total is used. Saving is income minus spending.
-
The CSO Household Budget Survey records how households spend, and is used for the CPI weights, for Budget decisions and for business planning.
-
$YED = \frac{\%\ \Delta Q}{\%\ \Delta \text{income}}$. Negative: inferior good. Between 0 and 1: necessity. Above 1: luxury. Keep the sign.
-
Engel's law: the share of income spent on food falls as income rises.
-
Survey data are cross-section and sample-based, so predictions from them are estimates.
-
When the price of a necessity such as rent rises faster than income, its share rises, squeezing other spending and saving.
Key terms: household budget, spending share, disposable income, Household Budget Survey (HBS), income elasticity of demand (YED), normal good, inferior good, necessity, luxury, Engel's law, cross-section data, aggregate demand.