Exercises: Estimating limits using tables
Observe the table of values of a function $f$ as $x$ approaches $3$ from the left and from the right: | $x$ | $2,9$ | $2,99$ | $2,999$ | $3,001$ | $3,01$ | $3,1$ |…
Observe the table of values of a function $f$ as $x$ approaches $3$ from the left and from the right:
| $x$ | $2,9$ | $2,99$ | $2,999$ | $3,001$ | $3,01$ | $3,1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $4,80$ | $4,98$ | $4,998$ | $5,002$ | $5,02$ | $5,20$ |
Estimate the value of $\lim_{x \to 3} f(x)$ and explain what you observed in the table to give your answer.
The table shows the values of a function $g$ near $x = 1$: | $x$ | $0,9$ | $0,99$ | $0,999$ | $1,001$ | $1,01$ | $1,1$ | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | $g(x)$ | $1,94$…
The table shows the values of a function $g$ near $x = 1$:
| $x$ | $0,9$ | $0,99$ | $0,999$ | $1,001$ | $1,01$ | $1,1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $g(x)$ | $1,94$ | $1,99$ | $2,00$ | $-1,00$ | $-1,01$ | $-1,02$ |
Estimate the left- and right-hand limits of $g$ at $x = 1$ and reason whether $\lim_{x \to 1} g(x)$ exists.
The table contains values of $h(x) = \frac{3x + 1}{x}$ for increasingly large values of $x$: | $x$ | $10$ | $100$ | $1.000$ | $10.000$ | $100.000$ |…
The table contains values of $h(x) = \frac{3x + 1}{x}$ for increasingly large values of $x$:
| $x$ | $10$ | $100$ | $1.000$ | $10.000$ | $100.000$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $h(x)$ | $3,1$ | $3,01$ | $3,001$ | $3,0001$ | $3,00001$ |
Estimate $\lim_{x \to +\infty} h(x)$ and confirm the result by calculating the limit algebraically.
The table shows values of $f(x) = \frac{\sen x}{x}$ (with $x$ in radians) around $x = 0$, where the function is not defined, as suggested by the figure: | $x$ | $-0,2$ |…
The table shows values of $f(x) = \frac{\sen x}{x}$ (with $x$ in radians) around $x = 0$, where the function is not defined, as suggested by the figure:
| $x$ | $-0,2$ | $-0,1$ | $-0,01$ | $0,01$ | $0,1$ | $0,2$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $0,9933$ | $0,9983$ | $1,0000$ | $1,0000$ | $0,9983$ | $0,9933$ |
Estimate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sen x}{x}$ and explain why it makes sense to talk about a limit even though $f(0)$ does not exist.
Marcos wants to estimate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x}$ using a table of values. To do this, he evaluates the function at $x = 0{,}1$, $x = 0{,}01$, and…
Marcos wants to estimate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x}$ using a table of values. To do this, he evaluates the function at $x = 0{,}1$, $x = 0{,}01$, and $x = 0{,}001$, obtaining the value $1$ in all three cases. Marcos concludes in his notebook: "Since the values clearly stabilize at $1$ as we approach $0$, the limit exists and is equal to $1$".
- a) Point out the conceptual error that Marcos makes in his estimation procedure using tables.
- b) Construct the corresponding table to approach $0$ from the left by evaluating at $x = -0{,}1$, $x = -0{,}01$, and $x = -0{,}001$.
- c) Based on the results of both trends, reason what can be stated about the existence and value of the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x}$.
We want to study the behavior of the function $g(x) = \frac{\sqrt{x} - 2}{x - 4}$ near $x = 4$. For this purpose, the following table of values is available: | $x$ |…
We want to study the behavior of the function $g(x) = \frac{\sqrt{x} - 2}{x - 4}$ near $x = 4$. For this purpose, the following table of values is available:
| $x$ | $3{,}9$ | $3{,}99$ | $3{,}999$ | $4{,}001$ | $4{,}01$ | $4{,}1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $g(x)$ | $0{,}2516$ | $0{,}2502$ | $0{,}2500$ | $0{,}2500$ | $0{,}2498$ | $0{,}2485$ |
- a) Based on the trends observed from the left and from the right in the table, give a reasoned estimate of the value of $\lim_{x \to 4} g(x)$ and express it as an irreducible fraction.
- b) Check the accuracy of your estimate by simplifying the function: multiply the numerator and the denominator of $g(x)$ by the conjugate $(\sqrt{x} + 2)$ and calculate the limit algebraically.
- c) If you tried to evaluate $g(4)$ directly by substituting into the original formula, what would you obtain? Explain why this fact does not contradict the result obtained for the limit.
The function $f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2}$ is not defined at $x = 2$. The table shows its values near that point: | $x$ | $1,9$ | $1,99$ | $1,999$ | $2,001$ | $2,01$ |…
The function $f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2}$ is not defined at $x = 2$. The table shows its values near that point:
| $x$ | $1,9$ | $1,99$ | $1,999$ | $2,001$ | $2,01$ | $2,1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $3,9$ | $3,99$ | $3,999$ | $4,001$ | $4,01$ | $4,1$ |
- a) Estimate $\lim_{x \to 2} f(x)$ from the table.
- b) Confirm the result algebraically by simplifying the expression for $f$.
- c) What is the value of $f(2)$? Explain the difference between this fact and the calculated limit.
Observe the table of values of $f(x) = \frac{1}{(x - 1)^2}$ near $x = 1$: | $x$ | $0,9$ | $0,99$ | $0,999$ | $1,001$ | $1,01$ | $1,1$ | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |…
Observe the table of values of $f(x) = \frac{1}{(x - 1)^2}$ near $x = 1$:
| $x$ | $0,9$ | $0,99$ | $0,999$ | $1,001$ | $1,01$ | $1,1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $100$ | $10.000$ | $1.000.000$ | $1.000.000$ | $10.000$ | $100$ |
- a) Describe the behaviour of $f(x)$ as $x \to 1$.
- b) Does the limit of $f$ exist at $x = 1$? Reason your answer, distinguishing between "infinite limit" and "no finite limit exists".
- c) What does the line $x = 1$ represent for the graph of $f$?
The position of a moving object is given by $s(t) = t^2 + 2t$ metres. a) Calculate the average velocity in the interval $[2, 2 + h]$ and complete the table: | $h$ | $1$…
The position of a moving object is given by $s(t) = t^2 + 2t$ metres.
- a) Calculate the average velocity in the interval $[2, 2 + h]$ and complete the table:
| $h$ | $1$ | $0,1$ | $0,01$ | $0,001$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| average velocity ($\text{m/s}$) |
- b) Estimate the instantaneous velocity at time $t = 2$ by observing the table.
- c) Check the result by calculating $s'(2)$ using the definition or differentiation rules.
To estimate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x}$, a student only calculates the values $f(0,1) = 1$, $f(0,01) = 1$ and $f(0,001) = 1$, and concludes: "the limit is $1$".…
To estimate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{|x|}{x}$, a student only calculates the values $f(0,1) = 1$, $f(0,01) = 1$ and $f(0,001) = 1$, and concludes: "the limit is $1$". Explain the error in their method, calculate the values they should have checked and state the correct conclusion regarding the existence of that limit.
A test vehicle from the DGT conducts a controlled braking test on a straight stretch of the A-6 motorway. The distance traveled (in meters) since the brake is pressed is…
A test vehicle from the DGT conducts a controlled braking test on a straight stretch of the A-6 motorway. The distance traveled (in meters) since the brake is pressed is modeled by $s(t) = 30t - 2{,}5t^2$, where $t$ is the elapsed time in seconds.
To estimate the instantaneous velocity of the vehicle at exactly $2$ seconds, the telemetry sensors calculate the average velocity over increasingly smaller intervals around $t = 2$, using the quotient:
$$v_m(t) = \frac{s(t) - s(2)}{t - 2}$$The table shows the measurements from the system:
| $t$ (s) | $1{,}9$ | $1{,}99$ | $1{,}999$ | $2{,}001$ | $2{,}01$ | $2{,}1$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $v_m(t)$ (m/s) | $20{,}25$ | $20{,}025$ | $20{,}0025$ | $19{,}9975$ | $19{,}975$ | $19{,}75$ |
- a) Physically interpret what it means to approach $t$ to $2$ from the left ($t < 2$) and from the right ($t > 2$) in this test.
- b) From the table, give a reasoned estimate of the value of $\lim_{t \to 2} v_m(t)$ and convert this instantaneous velocity to $\text{km/h}$.
- c) If the on-board computer tried to calculate the velocity by evaluating directly at $t = 2$ using the expression $\frac{s(2) - s(2)}{2 - 2}$, what mathematical difficulty would it encounter? Justify why the concept of limit allows engineers to solve this problem.
Consider the family of rational functions $f(x) = \frac{x^2 + kx - 6}{x - 2}$, where $k$ is a real constant to be determined. a) Reasonably deduce what value $k$ must…
Consider the family of rational functions $f(x) = \frac{x^2 + kx - 6}{x - 2}$, where $k$ is a real constant to be determined.
- a) Reasonably deduce what value $k$ must have so that $\lim_{x \to 2} f(x)$ is a finite real number instead of resulting in a vertical asymptote.
- b) With the found value of $k$, make a table of values by calculating $f(x)$ for $x \in \{1{,}9;\; 1{,}99;\; 2{,}01;\; 2{,}1\}$ and numerically estimate the value of the limit.
- c) If we now modify the numerator and define the function $h(x) = \frac{x - 5}{x - 2}$, analyze the signs of the numerator and denominator as $x$ approaches $2$ from both sides, and reason how it would be reflected in a table that $\lim_{x \to 2^-} h(x) = +\infty$ and $\lim_{x \to 2^+} h(x) = -\infty$.
The table shows values of $f(x) = \sen\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ (in radians) increasingly close to $0$: | $x$ | $0,1$ | $0,01$ | $0,001$ | $0,0001$ |…
The table shows values of $f(x) = \sen\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ (in radians) increasingly close to $0$:
| $x$ | $0,1$ | $0,01$ | $0,001$ | $0,0001$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $-0,5440$ | $-0,5064$ | $0,8269$ | $-0,3056$ |
- a) A student claims: "since the values of $x$ approach $0$, the limit exists and is approximately $-0,13$ (the mean of the table)". Critique their reasoning.
- b) Calculate $f\left(\frac{1}{k\pi}\right)$ for $k = 1, 2, 3, \ldots$ and reason, choosing suitable sequences of values for $x$, that the limit does not exist.
We want to estimate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x}$ to three decimal places using only a basic calculator. a) Design the table of values you would use: justify which…
We want to estimate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x}$ to three decimal places using only a basic calculator.
- a) Design the table of values you would use: justify which values of $x$ you choose and why it is advisable to approach from both sides.
- b) Construct the table and give the estimation of the limit.
- c) Check that your estimation is consistent with the fact that this limit is, by definition, the derivative of $e^x$ at $x = 0$.
You can do it on paper and send a photo with your answer.
The table shows values of $f(x) = (1 + x)^{1/x}$ near $x = 0$: | $x$ | $0,1$ | $0,01$ | $0,001$ | $0,0001$ | |---|---|---|---|---| | $f(x)$ | $2,5937$ | $2,7048$ |…
The table shows values of $f(x) = (1 + x)^{1/x}$ near $x = 0$:
| $x$ | $0,1$ | $0,01$ | $0,001$ | $0,0001$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $2,5937$ | $2,7048$ | $2,7169$ | $2,7181$ |
- a) Estimate the limit to three decimal places.
- b) What well-known number does this limit approach? Write it with its usual letter.
- c) Explain why it is not enough to calculate $f(0)$ to answer.
When a processor's fan turns off, its temperature $T(t)$, in degrees Celsius, begins to rise. The average rates of change of temperature have been measured over…
When a processor's fan turns off, its temperature $T(t)$, in degrees Celsius, begins to rise. The average rates of change of temperature have been measured over increasingly small intervals of $[60, 60 + h]$ seconds:
| $h$ ($\text{s}$) | $10$ | $5$ | $1$ | $0,5$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| average rate ($\text{°C/s}$) | $0,84$ | $0,79$ | $0,72$ | $0,71$ |
- a) Estimate the instantaneous rate of change of temperature at time $t = 60\ \text{s}$.
- b) What concept from the topic of derivatives does this value represent? Write it using mathematical notation.
- c) Interpret the sign of the rate in context and explain what information a negative rate would provide.
We want to determine the value of $\lim_{x \to 0} (1 + x)^{2/x}$. In class, two different approaches are proposed to solve it: Method 1 (Numerical estimation with a…
We want to determine the value of $\lim_{x \to 0} (1 + x)^{2/x}$. In class, two different approaches are proposed to solve it:
-
Method 1 (Numerical estimation with a table): Evaluate the function at symmetric values increasingly close to $0$ ($x = \pm 0{,}1$; $\pm 0{,}01$; $\pm 0{,}001$) and observe what number the decimals stabilize at.
-
Method 2 (Algebraic properties): Transform the expression using powers as $\left[(1+x)^{1/x}\right]^2$ and apply the known reference limit $\lim_{x \to 0} (1+x)^{1/x} = e \approx 2{,}71828$.
- a) Apply Method 1: calculate the values for $x = 0{,}01$ and $x = -0{,}01$ using your calculator (rounding to four decimal places) and propose an estimate for the limit.
- b) Apply Method 2: find the exact value of the limit in terms of $e$, calculate its decimal approximation to five significant figures, and compare this result with the estimate obtained in the previous section.
- c) Critically assess both methods: which of the two provides mathematical certainty and which only a conjecture? What problem would Method 1 present if the analyzed function exhibited strongly oscillatory behavior near $x = 0$?
David wants to estimate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + 100} - 10}{x^2}$. Convinced that "the closer $x$ is to $0$, the more reliable the estimate will be",…
David wants to estimate the limit $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + 100} - 10}{x^2}$. Convinced that "the closer $x$ is to $0$, the more reliable the estimate will be", he enters extremely small values into his scientific calculator and records the results in this table:
| $x$ | $0{,}1$ | $0{,}01$ | $0{,}001$ | $10^{-4}$ | $10^{-6}$ | $10^{-8}$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x)$ | $0{,}049988$ | $0{,}049999$ | $0{,}050000$ | $0{,}050000$ | $0$ | $0$ |
David concludes: "At first it seemed to approach $0{,}05$, but when really pushing it with $10^{-6}$ and $10^{-8}$ the function gives $0$. Therefore, the limit is $0$".
- a) Uncover the flaw in David's reasoning. Explain why a scientific calculator returns exactly $0$ for $x = 10^{-8}$ even though the numerator $\sqrt{(10^{-8})^2 + 100} - 10$ is not mathematically zero (think about significant figures and the machine's rounding).
- b) Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate expression $\sqrt{x^2 + 100} + 10$, simplify algebraically, and calculate the exact value of the limit.
- c) Based on what you have learned, reason why the class notes recommend reducing the distance to $a$ step by step, order of magnitude by order of magnitude ($0{,}1$; $0{,}01$; $0{,}001$), instead of hastily jumping to values like $10^{-8}$ when tabulating with digital tools.